1987
DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90156-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nasopharyngeal washings and swab specimens for diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus by EIA, FAT, and cell culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for nasopharyngeal swabs the difference was less evident, and the OIA test was only slightly less sensitive than IF. We expected that influenza virus would be detected in the concentrated cells from centrifuged nasopharyngeal aspirates to the same degree as from swabs (4,13). The superiority we found for swabs may indicate that free-virus particles may be washed away in the preparation step of aspirates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, for nasopharyngeal swabs the difference was less evident, and the OIA test was only slightly less sensitive than IF. We expected that influenza virus would be detected in the concentrated cells from centrifuged nasopharyngeal aspirates to the same degree as from swabs (4,13). The superiority we found for swabs may indicate that free-virus particles may be washed away in the preparation step of aspirates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Masters et al (67) compared NPAs with NPSs from children with suspected bronchiolitis for the diagnosis of RSV. Irrespective of the detection method used, NPAs resulted in better recovery of RSV compared to NPSs.…”
Section: Gnarpe Et Al (43) Compared Npss Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is no vaccine available for prevention of the viral infection, although antiviral therapy is known to be effective in some patients (1, 2, 11). For appropriate treatment of RSV infection, it is crucial to have an accurate and timely diagnostic method for detection of the virus.A number of techniques are available for detection and identification of RSV, including cell culture, enzyme immunoassay (EIA), immunofluorescence (IF), and conventional reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (6,7,8,9,12,16,17,21,22,25). The classical cell culture method requires prompt inoculation of the labile virus and is a time-consuming process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of techniques are available for detection and identification of RSV, including cell culture, enzyme immunoassay (EIA), immunofluorescence (IF), and conventional reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (6,7,8,9,12,16,17,21,22,25). The classical cell culture method requires prompt inoculation of the labile virus and is a time-consuming process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%