2019 Twelfth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ic3.2019.8844904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches in the Prediction of Terrorist Attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different data mining and ML techniques, including SVMs, random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR), were employed to analyse the dataset and predict the wouldbe terrorist groups, the success or failure of the attacks, and their effects on external factors. In the implementation, k-means clustering and dummy classifiers showed an improvement, while RF with the GTD and dummy classifiers with the GTD peaked to the marks of 0.82 and 0.56, respectively [7].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different data mining and ML techniques, including SVMs, random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR), were employed to analyse the dataset and predict the wouldbe terrorist groups, the success or failure of the attacks, and their effects on external factors. In the implementation, k-means clustering and dummy classifiers showed an improvement, while RF with the GTD and dummy classifiers with the GTD peaked to the marks of 0.82 and 0.56, respectively [7].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Agarwal et al [7] provided useful insights by tracking patterns and trends [10] in their analysis of a historical dataset of the GTD. They predicted the factors that can potentially correlate with the menace of terrorism.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Random Forest is used to predict the risk of terrorist attacks using 15 driving factors. In 2019, Agarwal et al [25] focused on analyzing the dataset of GTD and made prediction on different factors that might have given a blow to terrorism. Different data mining and machine learning algorithms such as SVM, Random Forest, and logistic regression have been used to understand the dataset and predict different factors such as the success of terrorist attack, the group that was involved in terrorist attack and the effect of different external factors involved in terrorist attack.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, however, we are interested in the task of prediction rather than detection. Additionally, our task is to predict terrorist attacks or events, which is distinct from works that have sought to infer characteristics of an attack, such as the responsible group, after it has taken place [2,5,31,32]. Few works have attempted to predictively model terrorist attacks, with the recent work of Python et al being the noteworthy exception [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%