2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vivo lung morphometry models from 3D multiple b‐value 3He and 129Xe diffusion‐weighted MRI

Abstract: Purpose To compare in vivo lung morphometry parameters derived from theoretical gas diffusion models, the cylinder model and stretched exponential model, in a range of acinar microstructural length scales encountered in healthy and diseased lungs with 3He and 129Xe diffusion‐weighted MRI. Methods Three‐dimensional multiple b‐value 3He and 129Xe diffusion‐weighted MRI was acquired with compressed sensing at 1.5 T from 51 and 31 subjects, respectively, including healthy volunteers, ex‐smokers, idiopathic pulmona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(107 reference statements)
4
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement of the 3 He and 129 Xe MRI‐based maximal diffusion length scales (the diffusion lengths obtained for maximum diffusion coefficients of 3 He and 129 Xe in lungs) suggests the agreement of the mean diffusion lengths for chosen diffusion parameters. The proximity of the LmDHe and LmDxe estimates was previously observed for a small group of COPD patients, where longer Δ Xe (8.5 ms) was used for inhaled 129 Xe/N 2 gas mixture …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agreement of the 3 He and 129 Xe MRI‐based maximal diffusion length scales (the diffusion lengths obtained for maximum diffusion coefficients of 3 He and 129 Xe in lungs) suggests the agreement of the mean diffusion lengths for chosen diffusion parameters. The proximity of the LmDHe and LmDxe estimates was previously observed for a small group of COPD patients, where longer Δ Xe (8.5 ms) was used for inhaled 129 Xe/N 2 gas mixture …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The proximity of the Lm He D and Lm xe D estimates was previously observed for a small group of COPD patients, where longer Δ Xe (8.5 ms) was used for inhaled 129 Xe/N 2 gas mixture. 39 Third, in the HV and AATD subgroups the additional emphysema biomarkers such as static-ventilation and T * 2 maps were obtained in a single breath-hold along with the ADC and morphometry maps. A consideration of the staticventilation based ventilation-defect-percent (VDP) 3 is out of the scope of this work, although, an example of the staticventilation image or short-TE, b = 0 image is shown in Figure 1C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FE simulations of 3 He and 129 Xe multiple b value DWI at the commonly reported in vivo diffusion times of 3 He Δ = 1.6 ms 13,15,22,38 and 129 Xe Δ = 8.5 ms 16,29 were performed. The global diffusion metrics, derived from both the SEM and CM, from the healthy acinar airway mesh were in agreement with those acquired from healthy volunteers with the same 3 He and 129 Xe DWI acquisition parameters.…”
Section: Validation Of In Vivo Diffusion Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the SEM-derived mean diffusive length scale (Lm D ) was indirectly validated with comparisons against CM-derived measurements in the same subjects across a range of acinar length scales. 29 However, the Lm D has not yet been directly validated against histology or known acinar geometries. Therefore, this work aims to validate the SEM Lm D , alongside CM-derived parameters, with FE simulations of hyperpolarized 3 He and 129 Xe DWI in realistic models of acinar airway geometry-derived from micro-CT images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same diffusion-encoding techniques, it is possible to directly estimate airspace dimensions by acquiring multiple images with different diffusion weightings and using either an analytical model of the airspace geometry [12][13][14] or a mathematical model of diffusion behavior. 15,16 These analytic methods, collectively known as diffusion morphometry, use Bayesian probability theory alongside a simplified acinar model to calculate standard lung morphometry parameters such as mean linear intercept (L m ), surface-tovolume (SV) ratio, and alveolar number density (N a ), alongside detailed estimates of acinar dimensions including alveolar sleeve depth (h) and acinar duct radii (R). These quantitative measures of lung microstructure are obtained noninvasively, thereby allowing subtle changes in acinar morphology to be measured longitudinally during both normal development and disease progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%