Comparison of in‐gel protein separation techniques commonly used for fractionation in mass spectrometry‐based proteomic profiling

Abstract

Fractionation of complex samples at the cellular, subcellular, protein or peptide level is an indispensable strategy to improve the sensitivity in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling. This study revisits, evaluates, and compares the most common gel-based protein separation techniques i.e., 1-D SDS PAGE, preparative 1-D SDS PAGE, isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients (IEF-IPG), and 2-D PAGE in their performance as fractionation approaches in nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of a mixture of protein standards and mitochondrial extracts isolated from rat liver. This work demonstrates that all the above techniques provide complementary protein identification results, but 1-D SDS PAGE and IEF-IPG had the highest number of identifications. The IEF-IPG technique resulted in the highest average number of detected peptides per protein. The 2-D PAGE was evaluated as a protein fractionation approach. This work shows that the recovery of proteins and resulting proteolytic digests is highly dependent on the total volume of the gel matrix. The performed comparison of the fractionation techniques demonstrates the potential of a combination of orthogonal 1-D SDS PAGE and IEF-IPG for the improved sensitivity of profiling without significant decrease in throughput.

Proteomics Analysis of Tissue Samples Reveals Changes in Mitochondrial Protein Levels in Parathyroid Hyperplasia over Adenoma

“…Although, the classical 2D approach is a golden standard for comparative proteomic analysis, it has some intrinsic limitations e.g., high percentage of gel-to-gel variations (16)(17)(18). To overcome the limitations of classical 2DE, the use of DIGE has been recommended (19,20).…”

Interactomic approach for evaluating nucleophosmin‐binding proteins as biomarkers for Ewing's sarcoma

“…Jafari et al. compared gel‐based protein separation techniques, including SDS‐PAGE, IEF‐IPG, and 2D‐PAGE, for their ability to serve as fractionation techniques for MS analysis of a complex protein sample . They reported that SDS‐PAGE yielded the highest number of identifiable proteins.…”

Trends in proteomic analysis of human vitreous humor samples

“…The most common protein fractionation techniques can be divided into two main categories: gel‐based and gel‐free. Gel‐based techniques include all types of 1DE and 2DE: SDS‐PAGE, nondenaturing PAGE, and IEF using IPG gel strips . Gel‐free fractionation, commonly used in proteomics, applies distinct liquid‐phase chromatographic methods such as RP, SEC, IEC, affinity chromatography , and IEF .…”