2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0643-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of image quality and in vivo appearance of the normal equine nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses in computed tomography and high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) is a well-established imaging technique in the diagnostics of equine sinunasal disease. High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming more readily available in equine veterinary medicine. MRI is appreciated for its superior ability to depict soft tissues with high contrast. To compare the established technique of CT in the depiction of the equine nasal cavities, paranasal sinuses and adjoining anatomical structures to 3 Tesla MRI the nasal cavities and paranasal sin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), enable fast non‐invasive visualization of animal anatomy in live animals (Lauridsen et al., 2011). CT provides differential appearance of bone, soft tissues, sinuses and cavities according to their radiodensity (Alsafy, El‐Gendy, & El Sharaby, 2013; Kaminsky, Bienert‐Zeit, Hellige, Rohn, & Ohnesorge, 2016) which in turn enables easy identification of those structures within CT slices. Although CT is an X‐ray‐based imaging technique, it is superior than conventional radiography, because it is not affected by superimposition or the thickness of tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), enable fast non‐invasive visualization of animal anatomy in live animals (Lauridsen et al., 2011). CT provides differential appearance of bone, soft tissues, sinuses and cavities according to their radiodensity (Alsafy, El‐Gendy, & El Sharaby, 2013; Kaminsky, Bienert‐Zeit, Hellige, Rohn, & Ohnesorge, 2016) which in turn enables easy identification of those structures within CT slices. Although CT is an X‐ray‐based imaging technique, it is superior than conventional radiography, because it is not affected by superimposition or the thickness of tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four-point rating scale used for the present examinations was designed to objectify results for a more detailed and less subjective comparison of CT and MRI. Whereas [18] focused on the CT and 3.0 T MRI’s ability to portray paranasal sinuses, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the current study is the first evaluation which scores the quality of CT and MR images of equine dental tissues based on a grading system and compares the influence of the condition of the specimens on image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons could be found in the MR coil positioning: whereas the whole head was scanned in the CT, examination coils were placed around the region of interest in the MRI, allowing a field of view of about 25 × 25 cm. The field of view in the current study ranged from 16 to 25 cm, therefore, mispositioning might lead to a decrease of signal intensity and image quality [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, advanced imaging techniques or sinoscopy are often required to reach a definitive diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) identifies apical infections in 97% of cases and is the current gold standard to diagnose sinus diseases . Limitations of CT include cost, availability, and the requirement for general anesthesia for select units, especially in North America.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%