2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of functional properties of edible insects and protein preparations thereof

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

25
214
12
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
25
214
12
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results (WAC values for the two extracts) are less than what has been reported (3.95 and 2.31 g/g) for other insect (like Tenebrio molitor and Schistocerca gregaria ) protein preparations (Zielińska, Karaś, & Baraniak, ); and a little less than the 1.87 ml/g reported by Zhao et al () for T. molitor . This could be attributed to the fact that the insects are of different species.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results (WAC values for the two extracts) are less than what has been reported (3.95 and 2.31 g/g) for other insect (like Tenebrio molitor and Schistocerca gregaria ) protein preparations (Zielińska, Karaś, & Baraniak, ); and a little less than the 1.87 ml/g reported by Zhao et al () for T. molitor . This could be attributed to the fact that the insects are of different species.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…The OAC values for the MP extract can be compared with that reported for Gryllodes sigillatus (3.22 g/g) and S. gregaria (3.22 g/g) protein extracts (Zieli nska et al, 2018). Whereas that for the OP compares with that (2.74 g/g) reported for T. molitor (Zieli nska et al, 2018).…”
Section: Color Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For mealworms to be successful in food applications, they should ideally possess several desirable characteristics, referred to as functional properties. To date, only a few studies have considered the technical functionality of mealworms or protein preparations thereof, such as solubility, water and oil binding, gelling, foaming and emulsifying capacity (Bußler et al, 2016; Kim et al, 2016; Yi et al, 2013; Xue Zhao et al, 2016; Zielińska et al, 2018). In general, mealworms were found to have high water and oil binding, good emulsion properties, but moderate to poor foam and gelling properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%