2017
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of five cluster validity indices performance in brain [18F]FETPET image segmentation using k‐means

Abstract: From the investigated cluster validity indices, the WB-index is best suited for automated determination of the optimal number of clusters for [ F]FET-PET brain images for the investigated image reconstruction algorithm and the used scanner: it yields meaningful results allowing better differentiation of tissues with higher number of clusters, it is simple, reproducible and has an unique global minimum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The silhouette coefficient (SC) [28] is a way to evaluate the clustering effect, which can evaluate clustering results for different algorithms based on the same original data. The SC of clustering results is in the range (−1, 1).…”
Section: Dfcm Clustering Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The silhouette coefficient (SC) [28] is a way to evaluate the clustering effect, which can evaluate clustering results for different algorithms based on the same original data. The SC of clustering results is in the range (−1, 1).…”
Section: Dfcm Clustering Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for cluster validation, unfortunately, there is no best Cluster Validity Index (CVI) for the k-Shape clustering algorithm. In this study, a proper CVI is used to compare the clustering result of k-Shape clustering algorithm with k-means clustering algorithm [27].…”
Section: A K-shape Clustering Algorithm For Driving Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracted radiomics features serve as computational biomarkers of image intensity, texture, and morphology descriptors, which are subsequently used by classifiers (e.g., logistic regression, supporting vector machine, random forest, etc.) to distinguish glioma from normal tissue 24–28 . Driven by recent developments in algorithms and increased computational power, deep learning methods, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been adopted as a new approach for the automatic glioma segmentation 11,29–31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to distinguish glioma from normal tissue. [24][25][26][27][28] Driven by recent developments in algorithms and increased computational power, deep learning methods, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been adopted as a new approach for the automatic glioma segmentation. 11,[29][30][31] The fully convolutional network (FCN), one of the early efforts of CNN-based segmentation models, 32 directly learns the image features at multiple scales by repeated convolutional layers and pooling layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%