Comparison of fast-track diagnostics respiratory pathogens multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay with in-house singleplex assays for comprehensive detection of human respiratory viruses

Abstract

a b s t r a c tFast-track Diagnostics respiratory pathogens (FTDRP) multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay was compared with in-house singleplex real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of 16 common respiratory viruses. The FTDRP assay correctly identified 26 diverse respiratory virus strains, 35 of 41 (85%) external quality assessment samples spiked with cultured virus and 232 of 263 (88%) archived respiratory specimens that tested positive for respiratory viruses by in-house assays. Of 308 prospectively tested respiratory specimens selected from children hospitalized with acute respiratory illness, 270 (87.7%) and 265 (86%) were positive by FTDRP and in-house assays for one or more viruses, respectively, with combined test results showing good concordance (K = 0.812, 95% CI = 0.786-0.838). Individual FTDRP assays for adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus showed the lowest comparative sensitivities with in-house assays, with most discrepancies occurring with specimens containing low virus loads and failed to detect some rhinovirus strains, even when abundant. The FTDRP enterovirus and human bocavirus assays appeared to be more sensitive than the in-house assays with some specimens. With the exceptions noted above, most FTDRP assays performed comparably with in-house assays for most viruses while offering enhanced throughput and easy integration by laboratories using conventional real-time PCR instrumentation.Published by Elsevier B.V.

Non-mumps Viral Parotitis During the 2014–2015 Influenza Season in the United States

“…Sample nucleic acid extracts were tested using CDC singleplex real-time RT-PCR assays for adenoviruses and parainfluenza types 1–4 [23]. Threshold cycle values were determined by manually adjusting the fluorescence baseline to fall within the exponential phase of the amplification curves and above any background signal.…”

Expanding severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance beyond influenza: The process and data from 1 year of implementation in Vietnam

“…Topics covered laboratory safety; setup of a molecular diagnostics laboratory; appropriate specimen collection, transport, and storage; overview of real‐time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (rRT‐PCR); software data analysis of rRT‐PCR; and a discussion on the implementation of expanded SARI surveillance. Regional institute personnel were trained to test for the panel of 7 non‐influenza respiratory viruses as well as to test for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS‐CoV) to increase preparedness in the event of an outbreak . Following this training, each RI had an additional site visit by CDC experts, who offered guidance that was specific to the needs of each laboratory.…”

“…At the RI laboratories, total nucleic acid (TNA, ie, both ribonucleic acids and deoxyribonucleic acids) was extracted from the specimens. The 7 non‐influenza pathogens were tested by singleplex rRT‐PCR assays, designed by the Division of Viral Diseases at the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC …”

Role of multiplex PCR analysis in children with febrile seizures

“…This commercial real-time PCR assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions with excellent performance in a number of studies [11][12][13].…”