Comparison of enamel-bracket bond strength using direct- and indirect-bonding techniques with a self-etching ion releasing S-PRG filler

Flores, T.; Mayoral, Juan R.; Giner, Lluís; Puigdollers, Andreu

doi:10.4012/dmj.2014-138

Cited by 22 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 37 publications

(80 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The bond strength of brackets can be effected by the surface preparation techniques, 27 bonding technique, 28 and the type of bonding materials. 29 Similarly, our results demonstrated that the type of bonding agent is important for the shear bond strength.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using Either Self-etching Primer or Conventional Method After Intracoronal Bleaching

Cakmak¹,

Koçak²,

Koçak³

et al. 2015

Turkish Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the initial shear bond strengths (SBSs) of ceramic brackets using either a self-etching primer (SEP) or the conventional method (CM) after intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate and distilled water. Methods: Eighty human incisors were divided into four groups according to bleaching and bonding procedures: Group 1, bleaching was not applied and the brackets were bonded with a self-etching primer; Group 2, bleaching was not applied and the brackets were bonded with the conventional method; Group 3, intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate was applied for three weeks and the brackets were bonded with a self-etching primer; and Group 4, intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate was applied for three weeks and the brackets were bonded with the conventional method. A self-etching primer (Transbond Plus) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer. After SEP application, the ceramic brackets were bonded with a light-curing adhesive (Transbond XT). For the conventional method, the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid. After etching, a thin uniform coat of primer (Transbond XT Primer) was applied and the ceramic brackets were bonded with a light-curing adhesive (Transbond XT). SBSs were measured after water storage for 30 days, after 1000 cycles of thermocycling between 5°C and 55°C. Bond failure location was determined with the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Results: For the SEP method, there was no significant difference between SBS values of the bleaching and non-bleaching groups. Furthermore, for the conventional method, the SBS value of the non-bleaching group was not significantly different from that of the bleaching group. SBS values of the SEP method presented significant differences from those of the conventional method (p<0.001). SBS values of SEP application decreased with and without bleaching. The ARI scores did not show any significant difference among the groups (p=0.174). Conclusion: Intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate and distilled water did not affect the SBS values of ceramic brackets.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using Either Self-etching Primer or Conventional Method After Intracoronal Bleaching

Cakmak¹,

Koçak²,

Koçak³

et al. 2015

Turkish Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using either a Self-Etching Primer or the Conventional Method after Intracoronal Bleaching

Ozlu¹,

Koçak²,

Koçak³

et al. 2016

Turk J Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the initial shear bond strengths (SBSs) of ceramic brackets using either a self-etching primer (SEP) or the conventional method (CM) after intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate and distilled water.Methods: Eighty human incisors were divided into four groups according to bleaching and bonding procedures: Group 1, bleaching was not applied and the brackets were bonded with a self-etching primer; Group 2, bleaching was not applied and the brackets were bonded with the conventional method; Group 3, intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate was applied for three weeks and the brackets were bonded with a self-etching primer; and Group 4, intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate was applied for three weeks and the brackets were bonded with the conventional method. A self-etching primer (Transbond Plus) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer. After SEP application, the ceramic brackets were bonded with a light-curing adhesive (Transbond XT). For the conventional method, the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid. After etching, a thin uniform coat of primer (Transbond XT Primer) was applied and the ceramic brackets were bonded with a light-curing adhesive (Transbond XT). SBSs were measured after water storage for 30 days, after 1000 cycles of thermocycling between 5°C and 55°C. Bond failure location was determined with the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).Results: For the SEP method, there was no significant difference between SBS values of the bleaching and non-bleaching groups. Furthermore, for the conventional method, the SBS value of the non-bleaching group was not significantly different from that of the bleaching group. SBS values of the SEP method presented significant differences from those of the conventional method (p<0.001). SBS values of SEP application decreased with and without bleaching. The ARI scores did not show any significant difference among the groups (p=0.174). Conclusion:Intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate and distilled water did not affect the SBS values of ceramic brackets.

show abstract

“…Reduced amount of adhesive after debonding (lower ARI) in comparison to AET [17] Lower SBS than AET [17] Legend: TC-thermally cured material; CC-chemo-cured material; LC-light-cured material; SBS-shear bond strength; SET-self-etch technique; AET-acid-etch technique; DB-direct bonding…”

Section: The Beginnings Of the Indirect Technique (1970-1999)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This was higher than the gold standard, direct bonding with light-cured composite, which reached a mean value of 13.88 MPa. However, further research did not prove the advantage of Sondhi's resin (Figure 3) [10,16,17]. [ Figure 3.…”

Section: Development Of Bonding Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Indirect Bonding Technique in Orthodontics—A Narrative Literature Review

Nawrocka

Łukomska−Szymańska

2020

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The technique described as indirect bonding is an alternative to the conventional intraoral method of bracket placement. The appliance position is planned and fixed on a plaster model and then transferred into the oral cavity. Indirect bonding is a precise and time-saving technique of bracket placement, growing in popularity in recent years. It provides a combination of great precision with time efficiency. The fundaments of the indirect bonding technique are presented here. From the first clinical trial conducted almost fifty years ago, the method has evolved; the progress that has been made is described. Modern technologies involving computer scanning and manufacturing have led to great precision in bracket placement. Digital innovations such as rapid prototyping and stereolithography open up a new avenue of research and represent the next steps in indirect technique development. Individual 3D transfers are convenient in difficult clinical cases and can improve the effectiveness of the procedure, reduce the number of technical stages and reduce total chairside time. This paper also summarizes the advancement in adhesive materials, including an overview of advantages and disadvantages of different types of bonding resins and of the mean shear bond strength (SBS) achieved in the indirect procedure.

show abstract

Comparison of enamel-bracket bond strength using direct- and indirect-bonding techniques with a self-etching ion releasing S-PRG filler

Cited by 22 publications

References 37 publications

Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using Either Self-etching Primer or Conventional Method After Intracoronal Bleaching

Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using Either Self-etching Primer or Conventional Method After Intracoronal Bleaching

Comparison of the Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using either a Self-Etching Primer or the Conventional Method after Intracoronal Bleaching

The Indirect Bonding Technique in Orthodontics—A Narrative Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About