2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of electron microscopy, ELISA, real time RT-PCR and insulated isothermal RT-PCR for the detection of Rotavirus group A (RVA) in feces of different animal species

Abstract: There is no gold standard for detection of Rotavirus Group A (RVA), one of the main causes of diarrhea in neonatal animals. Sensitive and specific real-time RT-PCR (rtRT-PCR) assays are available for RVA but require submission of the clinical samples to diagnostic laboratories. Patient-side immunoassays for RVA protein detection have shown variable results, particularly with samples from unintended species. A sensitive and specific test for detection of RVA on the farm would facilitate rapid management decisio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
34
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological tests and antibiotic susceptibility tests for the isolates were done according to the procedure described by World Health Organization [16]. The ELISA was used for detection of rotavirus [17]. Verbal informed consent was taken from study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological tests and antibiotic susceptibility tests for the isolates were done according to the procedure described by World Health Organization [16]. The ELISA was used for detection of rotavirus [17]. Verbal informed consent was taken from study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, coronavirus particles can be demonstrated in fecal samples by direct electron microscopy ( Figure 5), immune electron microscopy or immunolabeling with colloidal gold particles ( Figure 6) [27,[98][99][100][101][102].…”
Section: Winter Dysentery (Bcov-wd) In Adult Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical performance of various iiPCR for various bacterial and viral pathogens in companion animals, livestock animals, and aquaculture animals, food safety, and health care has been demonstrated to be comparable to that of the reference nested PCR, real-time PCR, and/or virus isolation method [28,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. In several cases, clinical sensitivity slightly higher than that of the reference realtime PCR methods was observed for targets with notable sequence variations; clinical specificity can be maintained by careful design of the primer and probe [36,[42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%