Comparison of Effect of Hiora Mouthwash Versus Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Gingivitis Patients: A Clinical Trial

Ramamurthy, Jaiganesh; Visha, MG

doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i7.24783

Cited by 41 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Topical oxygen therapy, potentially less toxic topical oxygen is also much more convenient in that it can be done at home, is less expensive, and has fewer or no complications [14]. Considering all the above factors that oxygen could play a role in reducing the severity of chronic inflammatory condition like periodontitis and since previously we have worked on plenty of topics in periodontology [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The current study was done to compare and assess the effect of oxygen releasing oral gel and chlorhexidine gel in the treatment of periodontitis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Oxygen Releasing Oral Gel Compared to Chlorhexidine Gel in the Treatment of Periodontitis

Niveda

Kaarthikeyan

2020

JPRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the current study is to compare the effect of oxygen releasing oral gel and chlorhexidine gel in the treatment of periodontitis and the objective was to assess and compare the changes in clinical parameters such as Probing pocket depth, Bleeding on probing, Clinical attachment levels between oxygen releasing oral gel and chlorhexidine gel. The current pilot study which compares oxygen releasing gel with chlorhexidine gel is a randomised split mouth clinical trial .All the patients included in the study were patients with moderate to severe periodontitis with no systemic diseases, not under any medication non smoking healthy patients. All the patients received supra and sub gingival scaling, pockets on molars with deeper probing depth on either maxillary or mandibular arch and the medication to be received by the patient were allotted randomly. Randomisation was performed using lot method.Oxygen releasing (Blue M gel) and chlorhexidine gel (Hexigel) was applied at the chosen site, patient was recalled for re application and was reassessed for clinical parameters Paired t test was done to compare the mean difference in probing depth in Blue M gel group and Hexigel group. The mean probing depth at the day of drug delivery was for Blue M gel group was 7.2 mm SD+/-0.42 mm and the mean probing depth six week after drug delivery was 4.7 SD+/- 0.57 mm with a significant p value of 0.42. The mean probing depth at the day of drug delivery was for Hexigel gel group was 7.0 mm SD+/-0.57 mm and the mean probing depth six week after drug delivery was 5.7 SD+/- 0.64 mm. Within the limitations of the study from the results it is seen that there is a significant difference in reduction in probing pocket depth. The mean difference between the probing depth reduction in group A (Blue M ) from baseline to 6 week was 2.3 and The mean difference probing depth reduction in group B (Hexigel ) from baseline to 6 week was 1.5. Group A showed better potential in probing depth reduction. It emphasises the fact that thorough sub gingival scaling and root planing along with adjuvant topical oxygen therapy aid in reducing the periodontal pockets further research has to be done to assess the effect of oxygen delivering agents in future.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Oxygen Releasing Oral Gel Compared to Chlorhexidine Gel in the Treatment of Periodontitis

Niveda

Kaarthikeyan

2020

JPRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Smoking is thought to affect the periodontal tissues mainly by the vascular and immunological response of the body as it would also induce a decreased local host response. Previously our team had conducted numerous clinical trials (Ravi et al, 2017), in-vitro studies involving periodontal disease pathogenesis (Priyanka et al, 2017;Varghese et al, 2015), comparative studies (Ramamurthy and Mg, 2018;Kavarthapu and Thamaraiselvan, 2018), Evaluation studies (Khalid et al, 2017;Thamaraiselvan et al, 2015), case reports (Panda et al, 2014;Ramesh et al, 2017Ramesh et al, , 2019, systematic reviews (Avinash et al, 2017;Mootha et al, 2016) reviews (Khalid et al, 2016;Ramesh et al, 2016b) and literature reviews (Ramesh et al, 2016b) over the past many years. Now we are focusing on epidemiological studies related to periodontal disease.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence Of Mandibular Third Molar Pericoronitis Among Smokers And Evaluation Of Its Treatment Outcomes - A Retrospective Study

Ramamurthy

2020

ijrps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pericoronitis is an infectious disease affecting the operculum overlying a semi-erupted or erupting tooth. Pericoronitis occurs mainly or particularly on the lower third molars. It is painfully debilitating at times and it's a common periodontal emergency found for many diseases, with tobacco being the major modifiable risk factor. It has a negative impact over oral health and oral hygiene. The aim of this study is to analyse the prevalence of pericoronitis among smokers. Patients included in this retrospective study were those with a diagnosis of pericoronitis from July 2019 till March 2020. Socio-demographic and clinical data of all the 109 patients collected such as age, gender, tooth or teeth affected by pericoronitis and treatment undergone were retrieved from the recorded details of the patients. This data was tabulated in excel and then imported to SPSS software for statistical analysis. During the study period, 109 patients presented with pericoronitis. The peak age for the prevalence of pericoronitis was 20-25 years accounting for 75.2% of the patients. The prevalence of lower left third molar (54.1%) being affected with pericoronitis was higher than the lower right third molar being affected (45.9%). Extraction (95.4%) was the frequently performed treatment for pericoronitis. Pericoronitis occurs more often in 20-25 years of age patients who are smokers. While the lower left third molar being the most common tooth involved in pericoronitis and extraction of the affected teeth was the treatment of choice among the majority of the population.

show abstract

“…But the use of ozone in Periodontology seems to be undismissable. Previously we have worked on plenty of topics in periodontology [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of using ozone and its role in periodontics the study was designed and aimed to assess the bacterial micro colonies formed in gingival tissues after irrigating with ozonated water and comparing it with distilled water and saline water which are the commonly used irrigating agents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Bacterial Micro Colonies Present in Tissue Samples Obtained Using Ozonated Water as an Irrigating Agent from Patients with Periodontitis

Rajeshwaran

Malaiappan

2020

JPRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontal diseases are chronic inflammatory diseases that are constantly associated with microorganism, conventionally scaling and root planing followed by flap surgical procedure is done to treat chronic periodontitis condition, irrigating agents are used during both sub gingival scaling and root planing procedure and in flap surgical procedure. Saline and distilled water are the commonly used irrigants and they non specifically reduce the bacterial count, Ozonised water is also used as an irrigating agent. Though it’s effect on plaque is known to be effective its effect on tissues is still questionable. The study is conducted to assess the number bacterial micro colonies formed in gingival tissues after irrigating with ozonated water and comparing it with distilled water and saline water which are the commonly used irrigating agents. The aim of the study is to assess the bacterial micro colonies formed in gingival tissues after irrigating with ozonated water and comparing it with distilled water and saline water which are the commonly used irrigating agents. A randomized, split mouth study was performed. A total of 10 patients suffering from chronic generalised periodontitis were recruited into the study; 20 gingival tissue samples were obtained from the patients at the time of surgery. Both the patient and the clinician were blinded regarding the type of the irrigating agent used. The plaque samples were transferred into carrier medium and were cultured for 24 hours; 24 h after culture, the samples were collected and total colony forming units were calculated. On counting the number of colony forming units formed, it was found that the amount of colonies formed from the samples treated with ozone showed mixed results, wherein it showed both increase and decrease in colony counts.

show abstract

Comparison of Effect of Hiora Mouthwash Versus Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Gingivitis Patients: A Clinical Trial

Cited by 41 publications

References 13 publications

Effect of Oxygen Releasing Oral Gel Compared to Chlorhexidine Gel in the Treatment of Periodontitis

Effect of Oxygen Releasing Oral Gel Compared to Chlorhexidine Gel in the Treatment of Periodontitis

Prevalence Of Mandibular Third Molar Pericoronitis Among Smokers And Evaluation Of Its Treatment Outcomes - A Retrospective Study

Assessment of Bacterial Micro Colonies Present in Tissue Samples Obtained Using Ozonated Water as an Irrigating Agent from Patients with Periodontitis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About