1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80253-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of echocardiography methods for assessment of left ventricular shortening and wall stress

Abstract: M-mode echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular fractional shortening and meridional wall stress has been used extensively alone and in combination to describe left ventricular systolic function. To determine whether the improved dimensional information afforded by two-dimensional echocardiography might result in shortening and stress calculations yielding a different view of left ventricular function, we compared two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiograms in 69 subjects (19 normal, 13 with aortic ste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17] LV meridional systolic wall stress was estimated by modifying previously published methods, assuming that LV geometry is spherical and wall thickness is uniform. 18 End-systolic wall stress (kdyne/cm 2 ) = 0.334…”
Section: Bpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] LV meridional systolic wall stress was estimated by modifying previously published methods, assuming that LV geometry is spherical and wall thickness is uniform. 18 End-systolic wall stress (kdyne/cm 2 ) = 0.334…”
Section: Bpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] LV meridional systolic wall stress was estimated by modifying previously published methods assuming that LV geometry is spherical and wall thickness is uniform. 17 The following formula was used for this measurement: end-systolic wall stress (kdyne/cm 2 ) =0.334× SBP × LVDS/[PWS × (1+ PWS/LVDS)]; where LVDS is systolic LV diameter and PWS is systolic posterior wall thickness.…”
Section: Bpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Coronary sinus flow was calculated using the thermodilution technique, 14 MVO 2 by the Fick method, and LVEF by the Simpson biplane method. 15 Circumferential end-systolic wall stress (ESWS) was calculated using Mirsky's formula described by Douglas et al 16 …”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%