2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01121.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dynamic (Brush) and Static (Pressure) Mechanical Allodynia in Migraine

Abstract: Allodynia has been described in migraine but has not been fully investigated for the different sensory modalities. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of dynamic (brush) and static (pressure) mechanical allodynia in migraine patients and to suggest a practical method of testing them in a clinical setting. Patients with International Headache Society-defined episodic migraine (EM) or with transformed migraine (TM) as defined by Silberstein and Lipton were prospectively recruited from the Jeffers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

14
80
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(19 reference statements)
14
80
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies on the prevalence of CA in migraine have shown a remarkable agreement between the results of QST and those obtained by the brush testing with regard to the prevalence of allodynia in these patients [2,3], supporting brush testing as a valid method for the detection of allodynia in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Data And Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, studies on the prevalence of CA in migraine have shown a remarkable agreement between the results of QST and those obtained by the brush testing with regard to the prevalence of allodynia in these patients [2,3], supporting brush testing as a valid method for the detection of allodynia in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Data And Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Over the past decade, there has been considerable interest in the pathophysiology of this phenomenon in headaches (particularly in migraine) and in its clinical implications [2,3,[5][6][7][8]. CA in migraine is currently thought to result from sensitization of pain-signaling neurons in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) that receive input from both intracranial structures and skin [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a clinic-based study, brush allodynia was present during an attack in 68% of patients with episodic migraine, in 41% of transformed migraine patients between exacerbations, and in 46% with an exacerbation [5]. There is considerable (but incomplete) overlap with pressure allodynia, as measured with Von Frey hairs [6].Central sensitization is thought to be the physiologic process underlying cutaneous allodynia in headache patients. In animal models, it occurs when a strong, nociceptive stimulus sensitizes the second-order neurons of the trigeminal nucleus or dorsal horn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a clinic-based study, brush allodynia was present during an attack in 68% of patients with episodic migraine, in 41% of transformed migraine patients between exacerbations, and in 46% with an exacerbation [5]. There is considerable (but incomplete) overlap with pressure allodynia, as measured with Von Frey hairs [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%