“…In the setting of complicated IAIs, a short-course antimicrobial therapy following an adequate SC intervention is a proper strategy for complicated IAIs, while it is not required for uncomplicated IAIs, such as uncomplicated cholecystitis or appendicitis [ 106 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 ]. The empiric antimicrobial therapy for complicated IAIs should be started as soon as possible and drug choice should be based on local ecology and AMR data, preferring antimicrobials with a spectrum of action against Enterobacteriaceae, enteric streptococci and obligate enteric anaerobes [ 79 , 106 , 112 , 113 , 119 , 141 ]: - Amoxicillin/clavulanate should be considered for empiric therapy in accordance with local AMR epidemiology, because the emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae has reduced its efficacy [ 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 ];
- Piperacillin/tazobactam is considered the optimal option for the treatment of complicated IAIs due to its broad spectrum of efficacy against Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, anaerobes, non-resistant Enterococci and certain classes of ESBL [ 145 , 147 , 148 ];
- Third-generation cephalosporines (e.g., cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime) in combination with metronidazole are active against Enterobacteriaceae and may be considered for uncomplicated IAIs [ 146 , 149 ]. Recently, two fifth-generation cephalosporines, namely ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, have been approved as treatments for complicated IAIs in combination with metronidazole, given to their action against several multidrug resistant bacteria [ 150 , 151 , 152 ];
- Carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem) have a broad spectrum of action and represent a useful resource against ESBL [ 146 , 153 , 154 ];
- Aminoglycosides (e.g., amikacin, tigecyclin) should be considered in case of beta-lactam allergy due to controversies on their toxic sid...
…”