1993
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(93)80364-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of distillation with other current isolation methods for the determination of methyl mercury compounds in low level environmental samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
158
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 490 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
158
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial attempts to avoid either MMHg distillation or extraction steps by direct ethylation of MMHg with NaTEB were inefficient, recovering 5% to 60% of added MMHg (Horvat et al 1993). However, a method has recently been developed to detect MMHg from direct ethylation of 2 L volumes of seawater ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial attempts to avoid either MMHg distillation or extraction steps by direct ethylation of MMHg with NaTEB were inefficient, recovering 5% to 60% of added MMHg (Horvat et al 1993). However, a method has recently been developed to detect MMHg from direct ethylation of 2 L volumes of seawater ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical methods, based on ethylation, to quantify MMHg, including the US EPA Standard Method 1630, require separation of MMHg from its environmental matrix. Either solvent extraction (Bloom 1989;Horvat et al 1993) or distillation (Horvat et al 1993) methods are commonly used to isolate MMHg for analysis. Following separation, MMHg is volatilized through derivitizaton, most commonly by addition of the ethylating agent sodium tetraethylborate (NaTEB) to form gaseous methylethylHg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the published methods for mercury speciation in environmental samples are based on the Westöö procedure 7 (an acid leaching method), solvent extraction, 8 -11 distillation, 8,12,13 or modification of Westöö methodology 14 (alkaline-based leaching) and supercritical fluid extraction. 15 The most widely used separation techniques are: gas chromatography (GC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with element-selective detection techniques such as atomic emission spectrometry (AES), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) or cold vapor AAS (CV-AAS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a simpler and more rapid speciation analysis method for the measurement of mercury species in water and biological samples is highly desirable. [8][9][10] Various speciation analysis methods for the measurement of organo-mercury species have been developed; however, at present, most methods for mercury in water and biological samples are based on gas-or liquid-chromatography separation in conjunction with a mercury-specific detector, such as atomic absorbance spectroscopy (AAS), 11 atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS), [12][13][14][15] or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). [16][17][18] The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for mercury speciation has the advantages of straightforward sample preparation and flexible separation conditions in comparison to GC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%