2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of discographic findings in asymptomatic subject discs and the negative discs of chronic LBP patients: Can discography distinguish asymptomatic discs among morphologically abnormal discs?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
82
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of controlled pressure injection can be an important reason to the discrepancy in PPV between the current and previous reports. Uncontrolled high intradiscal pressures and injection speeds have been shown to generate false positive responses [17,18,27]. It is likely that the lack of PCD was a strong confounding factor to many of those previous results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of controlled pressure injection can be an important reason to the discrepancy in PPV between the current and previous reports. Uncontrolled high intradiscal pressures and injection speeds have been shown to generate false positive responses [17,18,27]. It is likely that the lack of PCD was a strong confounding factor to many of those previous results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…O'Neill et al [17] also favors a lower pressurization when reporting 50 % false positive discograms at 25 psi above opening pressure. Further, Derby et al [18] stated that mean pressure initially evoking pain in positive discograms was 20 psi, also supporting a lower pressure range. The rate of low pressure positive discograms in the current study was in accordance with Derby et al [23], who showed a rate of 15 % when using manometry.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A majority of discography studies, actually even recent publications, have been performed either without controlled pressure registration 7 , 19 , 30 -40 or with maximal cutoff 100 psi above opening. 1,2,6,10,12,18,28,29,41 This high pressurization is often used when injecting negative control discs, which is recommended in discography. 15 , 29 Pressure recorded directly in NP is preferred when evaluating disc pressure but is not conventionally used because of lack of suffi ciently small and safe intradiscal transducers for human use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The executive Committee of the North American Spine Society deemed discography to be the only valid method for diagnosing discogenic LBP 3 . However, controversies exist concerning its accuracy and clinical significance 4,5 . The present study will summarize the results of diagnostic discography in a group of patients with LBP, and analyze its accuracy and clinical significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%