2016
DOI: 10.1007/s41062-016-0026-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different rheological parameters for rutting susceptibility of SBS + WMA modified binders

Abstract: It is important to understand rutting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rutting is one of the major stressors of asphalt pavements, caused by high temperature and high traffic loading. According to Singh et al [42], higher values of the rutting parameter indicate better rutting resistance. Figure 6 shows the trend of the rutting parameter as a function of three different temperatures, chosen in accordance with the literature [43][44][45].…”
Section: Rheology and Melting Rangementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rutting is one of the major stressors of asphalt pavements, caused by high temperature and high traffic loading. According to Singh et al [42], higher values of the rutting parameter indicate better rutting resistance. Figure 6 shows the trend of the rutting parameter as a function of three different temperatures, chosen in accordance with the literature [43][44][45].…”
Section: Rheology and Melting Rangementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Over the years, conventional/basic test methods including penetration, softening point, and Saybolt-Furol viscosity have been explored to characterize and quantify the hightemperature rheological characteristics of asphalt-binders relative to HMA rutting performance [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Although relatively simple to perform, these tests are empirical in nature and not directly performance related [19,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, conventional/basic test methods including penetration, softening point, and Saybolt-Furol viscosity have been explored to characterize and quantify the hightemperature rheological characteristics of asphalt-binders relative to HMA rutting performance [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Although relatively simple to perform, these tests are empirical in nature and not directly performance related [19,23]. From a technical perspective, these shortcomings can be attributed to: (a) the use of a single test temperature, (b) the specimen loading condition, (c) the high variability among test results, (d) the inability to reasonably characterize the asphalt-binder with respect to the mix rutting resistance and overall pavement performance, and (e) the unreliability to adopt for new generation materials such as modified asphalt-binders [18][19][20][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address this shortcoming, Shenoy (2001) introduced a new parameter: G*/(1 − (1/tan(δ)*sin(δ)), which considers the elastic component of binder and hence can be beneficial in determining the rutting resistance of both unmodified and modified binders [8][9][10]. However, none of the parameters, G*/sin (δ), and G*/(1 − (1/tan(δ)*sin(δ)) is able to simulate the behaviour of binders under high stress conditions such as those in the field [11]. Therefore, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) developed a new PG binder test called the Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) test to characterise the asphalt binder properties related to HMA rutting [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%