2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different quantification methods of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
68
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LGE was assessed with the use of ceCMR as previously described [8]. Briefly, breath-hold inversion recovery sequence was used with optimal inversion time to null normal myocardium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGE was assessed with the use of ceCMR as previously described [8]. Briefly, breath-hold inversion recovery sequence was used with optimal inversion time to null normal myocardium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence or absence of fibrosis was assessed on visual assessment of delayed gadolinium enhancement (without thresholding), because visual assessment has been shown to correlate well with the use of a threshold of signal intensity of 6 SD above the mean for normal myocardium. 17 …”
Section: Cardiac Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the LGE, all short-axis slices from the base to the apex were visually inspected to identify areas of a normal (completely nulled) myocardium. The mean signal intensity [and standard deviation (SD)] was derived, and a threshold of 6 SD exceeding the mean was used to define the areas of LGE (14). Summing the planimetered areas of LGE in all short-axis slices yielded the total volume (LVFM: g), which was also expressed as a proportion of the total LV myocardium (%LGE).…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%