2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different approaches for self-healing concrete in a large-scale lab test

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t sBoth approaches have potential to be applied in real-scale concrete structures. Use of encapsulated PU requires more preparation compared to the addition of SAPs. One approach is triggered through crack appearance the other by water ingress. SAPs resulted in the highest healing efficiency based on crack width measurements. Release of PU from the capsules and crack closure was clearly noticed from CT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, engineered cementitious composite (ECC) with unique micro‐crack behavior and tight crack width control properties also shows great potential in crack self‐healing . Among all these available self‐healing concrete technologies, encapsulation‐based self‐healing concrete is considered as the most promising one, when simply taking the maximum sealed crack width and depth as self‐healing governing parameters, according to the comparison made by Muhammad et al Moreover, the healing process of encapsulation strategy is more flexible, with no need for additional water, less curing time, and repeatable seal‐healing actions comparing with other traditional approaches …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, engineered cementitious composite (ECC) with unique micro‐crack behavior and tight crack width control properties also shows great potential in crack self‐healing . Among all these available self‐healing concrete technologies, encapsulation‐based self‐healing concrete is considered as the most promising one, when simply taking the maximum sealed crack width and depth as self‐healing governing parameters, according to the comparison made by Muhammad et al Moreover, the healing process of encapsulation strategy is more flexible, with no need for additional water, less curing time, and repeatable seal‐healing actions comparing with other traditional approaches …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various factors which influence the curing process of encapsulation‐based self‐healing concrete, including the composition of healing agents, the capsule materials, accelerators, ambient conditions, as well as crack patterns . Besides, experimental methods for self‐healing efficiency assessment also affect results . The aim of this review is to discuss different parameters which are relevant to the efficiency of encapsulation‐based self‐healing cementitious material, and propose valuable suggestions for the future investigation on this topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with detailed discussions and comparisons provided in [18][19][20][21][22][23]. In these strategies, there are not enough results about the mechanical recovery regarding the bacteria healing method, although it has been proved to be very effective for controlling the long term mass transport e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The glass capsules used to test large-scale self-healing concrete beams are typically made of borosilicate glass [33,34], therefore the same type of glass was chosen for the glass plates used in this work. Before use, the glass plates were degreased with acetone.…”
Section: Specimen Design and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%