2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Cas9 and Cas12a CRISPR editing methods to correct the W1282X-CFTR mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the frequency of HDR events, we included the donor sequence as a parameter in the CRISPResso2 analysis. More HDR events mediated by CRISPR/ Sp Cas9 were detected than with CRISPR/ As Cas12a; 17.07% vs. 14.56% and 12.37%, in similar fashion to our earlier findings [ 34 ]. However, in Sp Cas9 samples, more imperfect HDR events were seen (0.94%) than in the As Cas12a groups (0.41% and 0.68%) ( Figure 4 a–h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To estimate the frequency of HDR events, we included the donor sequence as a parameter in the CRISPResso2 analysis. More HDR events mediated by CRISPR/ Sp Cas9 were detected than with CRISPR/ As Cas12a; 17.07% vs. 14.56% and 12.37%, in similar fashion to our earlier findings [ 34 ]. However, in Sp Cas9 samples, more imperfect HDR events were seen (0.94%) than in the As Cas12a groups (0.41% and 0.68%) ( Figure 4 a–h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings may have been expected based on reports with other cells and species that indicate that integration of a repair template is not always precise [ 46 , 47 ]. In addition, Sp Cas9 may lead to higher levels of HDR correction than As Cas12a in some contexts, including in HEK293T and pluripotent stem cells where misintegration patterns indicate that the two sides of a DSB are repaired by separate cellular repair pathways including the involvement of microhomology as a driver of the misintegrations [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in class I, which includes nonsense or premature stop codon (PTC) mutations [4], some of which are among the most common mutations in CF, have been largely bypassed by the recently approved CFTR corrector therapies [19]. Ongoing efforts to rectify this situation include the search for novel small molecules that induce translational readthrough [35], or combinations of PTC readthrough with NMD inhibition [9,20] in parallel with more directed approaches including gene therapy or editing [36], or the blocking of exon junction complex (EJC) deposition at specific exon-exon boundaries using antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) [37]. In the present study, we provide a more detailed characterization of PTC-containing CFTR mRNA-namely, its relative abundance, integrity, and stability-in an attempt to elucidate some of the challenges facing strategies including PTC readthrough and NMD inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 SMG-1i was able to modestly increase CFTR mRNA abundance, protein expression and channel function in the 16HBEocell line CRISPR-edited to express W1282X-CFTR, 44 although such effects were not observed in a following study by other group using this cell model. 45 SMG-1i also demonstrated to rescue W1282X-CFTR in primary human nasal epithelial (HNE) cells, 46 and synergistic effects were also observed when SMG-1i and other read-through agents (eg, gentamycin, G418/geneticin, paromomycin) were co-administered, 47 reinforcing the idea that combination of read-through agents and NMD inhibitors may represent a potential Figure 2 Site of action of the different CFTR modulator drugs. CFTR modulator drugs may be grouped into five main types according to their actions on CFTR mutations: read-through agents (for class I mutants), correctors (for class II mutants), potentiators (for classes III and IV mutants), amplifiers (for class V mutants, and possibly all others, except VII) and stabilizers (for class VI mutants).…”
Section: Class I Mutations: Read-through Agentsmentioning
confidence: 83%