2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of c-Fos expression in brain regions involved in maternal behavior of virgin and lactating female mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the recognized importance of the VTA in MB in the rat and other mammals, and Stack et al (2002), reported no induction of FOS in VTA in lactating rats exposed to pups compared to controls. This is surprising since in lactating mice (Matsuchita et al, 2015) and rabbits (present report) interaction with pups induces a significant increase of FOS cells in VTA and also in FOS/TH-ir cells. Therefore this suggests an important difference between species for this structure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In spite of the recognized importance of the VTA in MB in the rat and other mammals, and Stack et al (2002), reported no induction of FOS in VTA in lactating rats exposed to pups compared to controls. This is surprising since in lactating mice (Matsuchita et al, 2015) and rabbits (present report) interaction with pups induces a significant increase of FOS cells in VTA and also in FOS/TH-ir cells. Therefore this suggests an important difference between species for this structure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In line with this idea, we found that the NA, which represents a main projection of the mPOA/vBNST, was similarly activated when OL mothers were tested with newborns or juveniles. Accordingly, several studies have shown that the interaction with pups is associated with c‐Fos expression in the NA . Moreover, Stack et al showed that unilateral knife cuts or NMDA‐induced lesions in the mPOA/vBNST caused an ipsilateral reduction in maternal behaviour‐induced c‐Fos expression in the NA shell, indicating that the activity in this region depends on the functional connection with these critical regions for the expression of maternal care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast to our hypothesis, we found double‐labelled Fos/DA cells under all conditions, and no significant increase in this double‐labelling in the pup‐exposed females. Although there is no previous report that has explored this issue in the rat, in the mouse and the rabbit, there is a significant Fos/DA increase in response to mother‐pup interaction or by expectancy to interact with pups after 24 hours of separation . This discrepancy across species is puzzling because there is an increase in dopamine release in response to pup‐stimuli in the nucleus accumbens of postpartum and hormone‐treated female rats .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the above evidence, the execution of maternal behaviour in lactating rats by pup exposure apparently does not activate VTA cells when using Fos protein as an index of cell activation . By contrast, recent work indicates that, in other species, such pup‐induced activation does occur; for example, exposure to pups induces Fos in the VTA in lactating mice and rabbits . The reasons for these differences may not be related to species in question but may depend on methodological differences in study design because, in the two rat studies, mothers were separated from their offspring for a 24‐hour or 48‐hour period prior to exposure, which is a procedure that was not adopted in the other studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%