2020
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2020.2981059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Silicon Carbide and Diamond for Thermal Neutron Detection at Room Temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SiC-detectors showed stable characteristics over 1800 s neutron irradiation at a flux of about 9×10 8 n cm − 2 s −1 (thereof about one third thermal) [28].…”
Section: Detector Characterization Under Neutron Fluxmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…SiC-detectors showed stable characteristics over 1800 s neutron irradiation at a flux of about 9×10 8 n cm − 2 s −1 (thereof about one third thermal) [28].…”
Section: Detector Characterization Under Neutron Fluxmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their main advantages are their fast response, their stability versus radiations, their high energy resolution, their ability to discriminate between neutrons and , their high thermal conductivity and their low semiconductor defect concentration. In addition, thermal and fast neutrons are able to be detected by adding Neutron Converter Layer (NCL) and /or by considering threshold energy reactions for this type of detectors [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introduction and Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal neutron measurements with these SiC-based diodes have been achieved at MINERVE Zero Power Reactor at CEA Cadarache in France for a maximal neutron flux of around 9.4 ×10 8 n•cm -2 •s -1 including 31 % of thermal neutrons [2]. A fluence study in order to demonstrate the stability under radiation has been performed at the BR1 research reactor at Moll in Belgium for a maximum fluence of around 2.0 ×10 13 n•cm -2 [3].…”
Section: Introduction and Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between the performance of diamond and SiC devices for neutron detection has been reported [23,17,24]. For thermal neutrons, single crystal CVD diamond devices showed better neutron-gamma discrimination, although as pointed out by the authors, that was much owed to the use of a more effective thermal neutron conversion layer in the diamond structures, which led to a higher energy deposition within the detection volume [24]. Despite the larger atomic displacement threshold, diamond detectors showed polarization effects for neutron fluxes above 10 9 n cm −2 s −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is possible with materials like SiC and diamond thanks to the low atomic number of their constituents [14,64,23]. It is also noted that neutron-gamma discrimination in SiC SBD detectors can be tuned by changing the working bias [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%