1995
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.131.10.1154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between familial and nonfamilial melanoma in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
30
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, as observed in previous series, 46 familial patients were more likely than sporadic patients to have multiple clinically atypical nevi, they did not have more skin biopsies of any type of lesion performed in the 5 years before the diagnosis of their first melanoma than did sporadic patients (see Table III). In contrast, familial patients were more likely than sporadic patients to have had more than 2 biopsies of atypical nevi during the 5 years after the initial diagnosis of melanoma.…”
Section: Family History Of Melanomasupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although, as observed in previous series, 46 familial patients were more likely than sporadic patients to have multiple clinically atypical nevi, they did not have more skin biopsies of any type of lesion performed in the 5 years before the diagnosis of their first melanoma than did sporadic patients (see Table III). In contrast, familial patients were more likely than sporadic patients to have had more than 2 biopsies of atypical nevi during the 5 years after the initial diagnosis of melanoma.…”
Section: Family History Of Melanomasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Several (including this study) found no association, 24,45,46 whereas others showed significantly thinner mean Breslow depths 27,47 or likelihood of lesions 0.75 mm or less in depth 37 in patients who reported a family history of melanoma. Because verification of the family histories (as was done in our study) was only performed in one of these series, 46 and other studies have demonstrated false-positive-reporting rates of up to 50%, 48,49 it is possible that confounding factors (eg, level of concern leading to skin examination) associated with the false belief of a family history of melanoma may have influenced the outcomes.…”
Section: Family History Of Melanomacontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…: no statistically significant non-cutaneous neoplasias, but they did not compare them with those of the remaining melanoma patients or the general population [17]. They also found 3% of patients with multiple melanomas and 5% with family history of melanoma [17], slightly lower figures than those previously reported in the literature for the same population [25]. Our data thus support the probability that ALM might appear in a certain cancer susceptibility setting but related to genes other than those associated with melanoma prone families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Currently, it is estimated that one in 59 men and women will be diagnosed with melanoma during their lifetime [3]. Although at least 90% of melanomas occur sporadically, the other 5-10% that occur within families represent an important risk factor for the disease [130]. Hemminki et al calculated the PAF to be 1.43% [1].…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%