2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942012000100012
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This suggests that the period ahead would be ideal to perform the process of embolization and endoscopic surgery by demanding less time would be associated with a lower morbidity. This study, however, failed to show which group of patients according to tumor stage would benefit from specific technical.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, preoperative embolization of feeder vessels i.e., super selective embolization of external carotid artery can be done to reduce blood loss without significant neurological complications [8]. There is no definite benefit of transarterial over direct tumoural embolization [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, preoperative embolization of feeder vessels i.e., super selective embolization of external carotid artery can be done to reduce blood loss without significant neurological complications [8]. There is no definite benefit of transarterial over direct tumoural embolization [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it could give us some comparative information. Moreover, we reviewed all the studies 7-24,31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it could give us some comparative information. Moreover, we reviewed all the studies 7‐24,31‐104 that reported on the endoscopic treatment of JNA, including case reports and studies lacking some information such as follow‐up, recurrence, or staging. We considered that in the absence of a comparative intension, a descriptive systematic review should include all the cases reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress in equipment means endoscopic surgeons can tackle progressively larger and more invasive lesions, such as some Radkowski type IIIa tumours or involving the orbit, the infratemporal fossa and the parasellar region, which are no longer considered absolute contraindications 1,28 . An endoscopic approach is preferable to open surgery because it ensures a better visualisation of the tumour margins, which translates to a more accurate dissection, less bleeding, less frequently requiring transfusion; other advantages include a shorter duration of surgery, smaller impact on craniofacial growth, no aesthetic defect and fewer complications 29 . En-bloc resection can be obtained by dissecting posteriorly in a submucosal and subperiosteal plane until transoral removal of the tumour; some authors recommend keeping the tumour enveloped in a vasoconstrictor soaked gauze and gradually exposing it to work in a bloodless field 30 .…”
Section: Endoscopic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%