2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02892-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between continuous accelerated hyperfractionated and late-course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of LCAF RT were encouraging, with the 5-year survival rate varying from 26% to 33%. [4][5][6] Furthermore, patients with ESCC who were treated with concurrent LCAF RT and chemotherapy had a 5-year survival rate of 40% and a median survival time of 30.8 months in the study by Zhao et al 7 Therefore, this study indicated better survival in patients who received concurrent LCAF RT and chemotherapy than in those receiving LCAF RT alone. However, Grades 3-4 and Grade 5 toxicity rates were 46% and 6%, respectively, which were more severe than that in LCAF RT alone and might be mostly owing to chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The results of LCAF RT were encouraging, with the 5-year survival rate varying from 26% to 33%. [4][5][6] Furthermore, patients with ESCC who were treated with concurrent LCAF RT and chemotherapy had a 5-year survival rate of 40% and a median survival time of 30.8 months in the study by Zhao et al 7 Therefore, this study indicated better survival in patients who received concurrent LCAF RT and chemotherapy than in those receiving LCAF RT alone. However, Grades 3-4 and Grade 5 toxicity rates were 46% and 6%, respectively, which were more severe than that in LCAF RT alone and might be mostly owing to chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The toxicities were slighter and response rates were encouraging in this trial in comparison with other previous studies. [3][4][5][6]8,9,[31][32][33] Given the overall size of this study, the results of the follow-up have been reviewed cautiously. However, the high response rate, milder toxicities and OS time when administering S-1, CDDP and LCAF RT were encouraging and support further Phase II or Phase III trial testing in locally advanced ESCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Since then, several results from retrospective and randomized studies have revealed similar conclusions. [9][10][11][12][13] Three recent independent meta-analyses from China demonstrated the therapeutical benefits of LCAF RT in comparison with conventional fractionation for EC. [14][15][16] Therefore, concurrent LCAF RT and chemotherapy have been widely accepted as a standard treatment for locally advanced ESCC in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al randomly assigned 101 patients with squamous cell cancer to receive either continuous accelerated hyperfractionated radiation (66 Gy) or late-course accelerated hyperfractionated radiation (68.4 Gy) (Wang et al, 2002). Compared with patients who received late-course accelerated hyperfractionated radiation, those treated with continuous accelerated hyperfractionated radiation had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3+ esophagitis (61% vs. 10%; P <.001); however, no benefit was seen in local control or survival.…”
Section: External-beam Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%