2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Ligand Behavior of N-Heterocyclic Phosphenium and Nitrosyl Units in Iron and Chromium Complexes

Abstract: KEYWORDS N-heterocyclic Phosphenium complexes -NO complexes -π-acceptor ligandselectronic structure -ligand centered reactivity ABSTRACT. N-heterocyclic phosphenium (NHP) and nitrosonium (NO + ) ligands are often viewed as isolobal analogues which share the capability to switch between different charge states and display thus redox 'non-innocent' behavior. We report here on mixed complexes [(NHP)M(CO)n(NO)] (M = Fe, Cr; n = 2, 3), which permit evaluating the donor/acceptor properties of both types of ligands a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cis ‐ and trans ‐ 2 a , b show diagnostic downfield 31 P{ 1 H} chemical shifts for signals due to the new phosphenium ligand ( δ =440–441 ppm). The observed preference for trans versus cis geometry in 2 a , b is consistent with the established strong π‐acidity of phosphenium ligands, [15, 17b, 18a, 19, 20] since a trans structure ensures that PR 2 + does not compete with CO ligands for π‐backbonding at a Mo‐based d‐orbital [21] . X‐ray diffraction analysis of crystals of 2 b confirmed the solid state structure of the trans isomer (Figure 1), with bond angles at the phosphenium (P2) consistent with planarity at this sp 2 ‐hybridized center, and a short Mo‐P2 distance of 2.29 Å, relative to the Mo‐phosphine (P1) distance of 2.52 Å.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Cis ‐ and trans ‐ 2 a , b show diagnostic downfield 31 P{ 1 H} chemical shifts for signals due to the new phosphenium ligand ( δ =440–441 ppm). The observed preference for trans versus cis geometry in 2 a , b is consistent with the established strong π‐acidity of phosphenium ligands, [15, 17b, 18a, 19, 20] since a trans structure ensures that PR 2 + does not compete with CO ligands for π‐backbonding at a Mo‐based d‐orbital [21] . X‐ray diffraction analysis of crystals of 2 b confirmed the solid state structure of the trans isomer (Figure 1), with bond angles at the phosphenium (P2) consistent with planarity at this sp 2 ‐hybridized center, and a short Mo‐P2 distance of 2.29 Å, relative to the Mo‐phosphine (P1) distance of 2.52 Å.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…[14][15][16][17][18] The possibility to describe NHP + /NHPligands in these two states makes them comparable to nitrosyls (NO + /NO -) and makes assigning formal oxidation states to the metals and exact electronic descriptions to the redox active ligand abstruse, culminating in a covalent bonding situation where formal oxidation states have lost their significance. [19,20] The notable advantage of NHP + ligands over nitrosyls is that they are sterically and electronically tunable, by changing the N-substituents or the backbone. Due to the inverted binding properties of NHP + ligands, the tunability of their steric and electronic properties and the potential interconversion to the formally NHPstate, NHP's bound to metal fragments could display different reactivities and open many new potential applications if studied in more depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18] The possibility to describe NHP + /NHPligands in these two states makes them comparable to nitrosyls (NO + /NO -) and makes assigning formal oxidation states to the metals and exact electronic descriptions to the redox active ligand abstruse, culminating in a covalent bonding situation where formal oxidation states have lost their significance. [19,20] The nota-dimer [(PPP)Rh(CN t Bu)] 2 (5). Analysis of the solid-state structures and computational studies have provided insight into the electronic structure and bonding in 3-5, revealing that the NHP +/fragments in 3, 4, and 5 are best described using an NHP -/Rh I description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a pyramidal geometry about the phosphorus center may indicate two-electron reduction of the NHP + ligand to an anionic NHP – phosphido moiety, leading to a more covalent M–P NHP bond. The two binding modes of NHP +/− s and ambiguity in metal formal oxidation states that ensues draw to mind an interesting analogy to nitrosyl ligands (NO +/0/‑ ) ligands in their coordination chemistry, allowing NHP +/− s to be considered as tunable versions of NO +/0/– . , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%