2018
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2016.0309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Effects of Service-Learning Versus Nonservice-Learning Project Experiences on Service Leadership Emergence and Meaning Schema Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, the methods of e learning are good presented in the teaching and methodological literature for correspondence education in Universities, and E-portfolio as well [7]. The authors of teaching methods using distance technologies did not assume the situation of the complete transition of students of full-time courses to e-learning in case of abandoning traditional forms of conducting classes [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, the methods of e learning are good presented in the teaching and methodological literature for correspondence education in Universities, and E-portfolio as well [7]. The authors of teaching methods using distance technologies did not assume the situation of the complete transition of students of full-time courses to e-learning in case of abandoning traditional forms of conducting classes [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hong Kong based researchers, Chen et al (2018) identified three interrelated variables in addition to the above-mentioned 3 Rs, which help distinguish between service-learning project experience and non-service-learning project experience. The first variable is project experiences.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Assessing Process Variables Salient For Service-learning Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing authentic problems (Snell et al, 2015) c. Reality (Godfrey et al, 2005) d. Project efficacy belief (Chen et al, 2018) e. Community voices are included (Jacoby, 1996) f. Influence of community voices (Eyler & Giles, 1999) g. Service quality, diversity in service (Eyler & Giles, 1999) 2. POR plays a constructive role a. POR responsiveness (Chen et al, 2018) b. POR commitment (Snell et al, 2015) 3. Effective preparation and support a.…”
Section: Operational Process Variables For Successful Service-learning Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pedagogical approach of service learning is community-driven and allows students the opportunity to fully engage in their discipline or specialization in a community-based setting while meeting a need in their community. It is a type of high impact learning that provides students an opportunity to address real needs of a community, while receiving instructional oversight and support (Chen, Snell, & Wu, 2018). John Dewey (1938) assisted in the development of the foundations of the service learning encouraging the idea that learning is enhanced through civic participation and real-community problem-solving (Gerstenblatt & Gilbert, 2014).…”
Section: Service Learning and Self Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, students provide a service via a service-learning project which provides opportunities for real-life practice (reality), they receive learning as they provide a needed service (reciprocity) and then are able to spend time carefully thinking about their experiences and knowledge (reflection) at the completion of the assignment in a safe and nurturing environment. This is important because students' psychological perceptions of service learning influence their perception of how service-learning effects their development of learned skills (Chen & Wu, 2018).…”
Section: Service Learning and Self Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%