2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the effectiveness of blended learning and traditional learning in an orthopedics course

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mixed teaching mode is superior to the traditional teaching mode in enriching students’ professional knowledge and cultivating students’ comprehensive ability. It can effectively improve the quality of education, improve students’ learning effect, and enhance students’ satisfaction [ 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: The State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed teaching mode is superior to the traditional teaching mode in enriching students’ professional knowledge and cultivating students’ comprehensive ability. It can effectively improve the quality of education, improve students’ learning effect, and enhance students’ satisfaction [ 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: The State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to what was stated that blended learning during the COVID-19 pandemic was less significant in improving student learning outcomes (Finlay et al, 2022). Research results which state that blended learning is effective in supporting learning during the covid-19 pandemic (Suwannaphisit et al, 2021;Wibawa, 2017). Not much different from the research presented who also said that blended learning combined with innovative learning effectively creates an independent learning atmosphere, as well as a learning environment that encourages students to want to learn (Herwinarso et al, 2020;Marie, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Individual learning independent of time and place, flexible scheduling, overcoming distance and time barriers, economies of scale, and novel teaching methods can be cited as clearly advantageous. The lack of student interaction with faculty, social isolation, time to prepare and the need to remain current with regard to digital teaching formats, upfront costs for infrastructure, and technical problems can be considered as drawbacks [ 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ].The range of courses available at universities for this purpose is broad, diverse and therefore difficult to oversee [ 23 , 50 , 51 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ]. Moreover, students’ place of study, origin, previous exposure to digital teaching content, and gender need to be considered [ 49 , 56 , 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the perceptions of current medical students can shape the course content and future directions for developing necessary training and processes for medical students that can equip them well to manage the increasing digitalization of medicine. Therefore, a sensible mixture of digital teaching with face-to-face units in the sense of blended learning would be a reasonable and feasible strategy to implement the digital transformation of the medical curriculum in Germany in the long term and makes students better prepared for further pandemic situations or similar circumstances [ 24 , 50 , 51 , 54 , 57 ]. As David Cook has stated, “ Like blackboards and slides, WBL [web-based learning] is a powerful tool—but only a tool—that if used wisely can greatly facilitate learning ” [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%