2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0519-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspecification

Abstract: BackgroundLog-binomial and robust (modified) Poisson regression models are popular approaches to estimate risk ratios for binary response variables. Previous studies have shown that comparatively they produce similar point estimates and standard errors. However, their performance under model misspecification is poorly understood.MethodsIn this simulation study, the statistical performance of the two models was compared when the log link function was misspecified or the response depended on predictors through a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
229
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
229
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate mixed-effect Poisson models were used to identify associations between selected covariates and the probability of having a drug resistant infection. Using a Poisson distribution and estimating a robust variance is an alternative to fitting log-risk models (that use a binomial distribution), which often do not converge (36,37). Full specification of the model is available in Supplemental Text 1.…”
Section: Comparison Of Allele Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate mixed-effect Poisson models were used to identify associations between selected covariates and the probability of having a drug resistant infection. Using a Poisson distribution and estimating a robust variance is an alternative to fitting log-risk models (that use a binomial distribution), which often do not converge (36,37). Full specification of the model is available in Supplemental Text 1.…”
Section: Comparison Of Allele Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the associations between these preferences and age, sexual identity and gender identity characteristics using chi-squared tests with a correction for survey data [35]. As the outcome was prevalent, we used RDS-II weighted robust Poisson regression (also dropping seed participants) to obtain weighted prevalence ratios [36,37] to assess associations between testing in the last 6 months and sociodemographic, sexual behaviour and self-reported STI symptoms, examining first bivariate associations and then adjusting sexual behaviour and STI symptom models for any sociodemographic variables showing evidence for associations with the outcome (Wald test p<0.2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 With this model, the unbiased prevalence ratio (PR) can be measured directly. [18][19][20] We con-ducted both unadjusted bivariate analyses to assess the relation between the outcome and exposure variables, and a multi variate adjusted model. All models used robust error variances, and we used survey weights for all statistical analyses to account for the survey sampling design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%