2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing microbial risks from multiple sustainable waste streams applied for agricultural use: Biosolids, manure, and diverted urine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study focused on HAdV prevalence in various water environments. The highest HAdV prevalence was observed in wastewater landfills, likely as a result of the frequent, extensive disposal of biosolids in landfills that increase the level of pathogens in the resultant leachate [ 39 ]. Moreover, landfills and associated facilities were reported to have a HAdV prevalence of 75% [ 40 ], less than that reported in the current study at 83.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study focused on HAdV prevalence in various water environments. The highest HAdV prevalence was observed in wastewater landfills, likely as a result of the frequent, extensive disposal of biosolids in landfills that increase the level of pathogens in the resultant leachate [ 39 ]. Moreover, landfills and associated facilities were reported to have a HAdV prevalence of 75% [ 40 ], less than that reported in the current study at 83.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study introduced a QMRA framework to promote a water reuse concept of receiving water in industrial communities. Adenoviruses have been widely used for QMRA in many applications, such as direct potable reuse (Amoueyan et al, 2019), indirect potable reuse to augment ground or surface water drinking sources (Amoueyan et al, 2019;Purnell et al, 2020), indirect wastewater reuse (Ahmed et al, 2018), biosolids for agricultural land applications (Hamilton et al, 2020), public drinking water supplies (Owens et al, 2020), natural recreational water (Federigi et al, 2019), stormwater runoff (Ahmed et al, 2019), and occupational exposure at wastewater treatment facilities (Carducci et al, 2018). In this study, HAdV40/41 distribution functions were estimated from crAssphage distributions, as supported by a significant correlation between these two DNA markers in wastewater (Farkas et al, 2019;Sirikanchana et al, 2020;Tandukar et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los sistemas agrícolas de regadío son considerados generadores de contaminación difusa de aguas superficiales, pues pueden inducir problemas de eutroficación e hipoxia por excesos en concentración de sales de nitrógeno y fósforo por la aplicación de fertilizantes [8] Según Pachepsky [9], la calidad microbiana de las aguas de irrigación puede ser afectada por diferentes fuentes: patrones climáticos [10], deyecciones animales [11], fuentes de contaminación difusa como la escorrentía que lava zonas de los agroecosistemas [12] o ingreso de aguas residuales sin tratamientos adecuados [13], prácticas agrícolas como abonos orgánicos y purines [14]. Además, se pueden producir cambios en la movilización del agua entre la fuente y los campos de cultivos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified