2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9309-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing bird assemblages in large and small fragments of the Atlantic Forest hotspots

Abstract: The Atlantic Forest (AF) is one of the Wve most threatened and megadiverse world hotspots. It is arguably the most devastated and highly threatened ecosystem on the planet. The vast scope of habitat loss and extreme fragmentation in the AF hotspots has left intact very few extensive and continuous forested fragments. We compared bird assemblages between small (<100 ha) and large (>6,000 ha) forest remnants, in one of the largest AF remnants in Argentina. We performed 84 point-counts of birds in four large frag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(25 reference statements)
4
30
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…South America loses about 2.5 million ha of humid tropical forest per year to deforestation (Achard et al 2002), with strong and direct impacts on forest birds at the local and regional scale (e.g. Ribon et al 2003;Lees and Peres 2006;Stouffer et al 2006Stouffer et al , 2009Giraudo et al 2008). The most important step to conserve forest bird communities in South America remains the protection of large tracts of native forest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South America loses about 2.5 million ha of humid tropical forest per year to deforestation (Achard et al 2002), with strong and direct impacts on forest birds at the local and regional scale (e.g. Ribon et al 2003;Lees and Peres 2006;Stouffer et al 2006Stouffer et al , 2009Giraudo et al 2008). The most important step to conserve forest bird communities in South America remains the protection of large tracts of native forest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points were sampled in random order. During the 10-min counts, I recorded all individuals heard or seen up to a 100 m circumference (which is the radius often used in bird monitoring schemes- Dunford and Freemark 2005;Giraudo et al 2008). In order to exclude migrants, birds in flight were not recorded.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points were sampled in a random order. During each 10-min count, we recorded all the individuals heard and seen within a radius of 100 m (Giraudo et al 2008). In order to exclude migrants, we did not record birds flying above the canopy since they do not use windthrow being sampled (Faccio 2003).…”
Section: Bird Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%