1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-128x(199905/08)13:3/4<397::aid-cem559>3.0.co;2-i
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Comparing alternative approaches for multivariate statistical analysis of batch process data

Abstract: Batch process data can be arranged in a three‐way matrix (batch × variable × time). This paper provides a critical discussion of various aspects of the treatment of these multiway data. First, several methods that have been proposed for decomposing three‐way data matrices are discussed in the context of batch process data analysis and monitoring. These methods are multiway principal component analysis (MPCA)—also called Tucker1—parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and Tucker3. Secondly, different ways of unfoldi… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
215
10
2
0

Citation Types

0
60
0
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
180
24
19

Relationship

8
215

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 223 publications

(60 citation statements)
references

References 19 publications

0
60
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…If it is desired to get more precise information is necessary to study each of these planes containing the different principal component projections. As Westerhuis shown, the sum of the variances of the two first principal components, exceed 80% of the original data variance [3]. In Figure 7 is evident a separation between the baseline and different damage cases and a very good fit between the baseline and the undamaged case.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Results
mentioning
confidence: 81%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…If it is desired to get more precise information is necessary to study each of these planes containing the different principal component projections. As Westerhuis shown, the sum of the variances of the two first principal components, exceed 80% of the original data variance [3]. In Figure 7 is evident a separation between the baseline and different damage cases and a very good fit between the baseline and the undamaged case.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Results
mentioning
confidence: 81%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…If it is desired to obtain more precise information it is necessary to study each of these planes containing the different principal component projections. As Westerhuis et al showed, the sum of the variances of the two first principal components exceeds 80% of the original data variance for most cases (Westerhuis et al 1999). In this particular case, the two first principal components explain more than 95% of the variance.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Results
mentioning
confidence: 87%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this work, the contribution resides essentially in how data are collected, how data are arranged, how data are pre-processed, and how SVM is applied. For instance, in [38,39] it can be noted that there are six possible ways of arranging a third-order tensor. Each one of these six possible choices will lead to a different overall performance of the applied strategy.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%