2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2015.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on the accuracy of solitary wave generations in an ISPH-based numerical wave flume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the time-averaged water surface position in an open channel flow, the study of dynamic water surface behaviours would be more challenging. To identify the free surface, the divergence of particle positions can be used to compute Figure 14 Normalized turbulent intensity profiles of (a) streamwise direction; and (b) vertical direction, for flow conditions (1), (2), (5) and (8) the instantaneous water surface elevation at a desired streamwise location (Farhadi, Ershadi, Emdad, & Goshtasbi Rad, 2016;Lee et al, 2008). This divergence in the SPH formulation is defined as:…”
Section: Water Surface Identification and Probability Density Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the time-averaged water surface position in an open channel flow, the study of dynamic water surface behaviours would be more challenging. To identify the free surface, the divergence of particle positions can be used to compute Figure 14 Normalized turbulent intensity profiles of (a) streamwise direction; and (b) vertical direction, for flow conditions (1), (2), (5) and (8) the instantaneous water surface elevation at a desired streamwise location (Farhadi, Ershadi, Emdad, & Goshtasbi Rad, 2016;Lee et al, 2008). This divergence in the SPH formulation is defined as:…”
Section: Water Surface Identification and Probability Density Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine which particle belonged to the water surface, a threshold value of 1.4, which gives the highest standard deviation of the water surface, was used in the present study. This value is also within the range 1.2-1.5 used by other SPH researchers (Farhadi et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2008). In this work, the instantaneous water surface elevations at a desired streamwise location x were computed as follows: first several vertical locations were defined below and above the initial water surface level by using a gauge spacing of y = 0.02 mm.…”
Section: Water Surface Identification and Probability Density Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature is implemented to recognize the free surface particles. Lee et al [2008] and Farhadi et al [2016] suggested that a threshold criterion ranging from 1.2 to 1.5 that can be used to determine which particles belong to the water surface. Most of the free surface particles are accurately detected and some of them could not be detected.…”
Section: Literature Review On Sph Applications In Open Channel Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keulegan (1948) and Mei (1983) noticed that solitary wave damped out as it propagates by frictional & viscous effect. Farhadi et al (2016) experimentally developed the study done by Wu et al (2014a) accurately in a laboratory using a piston-type wavemaker. In the present study, the inflow method generates the wave in a numerical wave tank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%