2019
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/363/1/012026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Methods to Estimate Historical Peat Burnt Area in Gaung – Batang Tuaka River of Peat Hydrological Unit (KHG)

Abstract: As a country with 14.9 ha of peatland, Indonesia is a major contributor of GHG emissions, especially from peat ecosystems. These emissions were caused by peat decomposition and peat fires. However, accurate estimation of peat burnt area was still a barrier that prevented the inclusion of peat fire emission in the document of Forest Reference Emission Level (FREL) as a followup document to REDD+ activities. This research has the objective to analyse two different approaches to estimate peat burnt area used in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the value of organic carbon content (C org) was assumed to depend on the peat maturity type. We estimated the annual burned area using a semi-automatic approach, analysis through the visual process, and identification of hotspot data, which could provide a more accurate peat burned area than the automatic approach as used in the Forest Reference Emission Level document (Rossita et al 2019). We suggest referring to the previous study for a detailed explanation of the method (Rossita et al 2019).…”
Section: -Insert Table 3 -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the value of organic carbon content (C org) was assumed to depend on the peat maturity type. We estimated the annual burned area using a semi-automatic approach, analysis through the visual process, and identification of hotspot data, which could provide a more accurate peat burned area than the automatic approach as used in the Forest Reference Emission Level document (Rossita et al 2019). We suggest referring to the previous study for a detailed explanation of the method (Rossita et al 2019).…”
Section: -Insert Table 3 -mentioning
confidence: 99%