2017
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1309602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Seismic Risk Assessment of Basilica-type Churches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, it is possible to observe that the first mode associated with not negligible participating mass is a transversal mode, namely the first out-of-plane mode of the longitudinal walls of the main nave. Dispersion of vibration modes for such typology of structures has been already observed by other authors [40,41,42] and this can be considered a specific structural characteristic of these structures, in contrast with ordinary or modern buildings where the modal participating mass is generally greater than 70% and the first three modes give a cumulative mass generally greater than 85%. In addition, the results shown by the modal analyses are in agreement with the observation of the systematic analysis of the damage suffered by the churches after major earthquakes, that highlight that the church seismic behavior is predominantly ruled by the activation of local collapse mechanisms on several macro-elements [41,43,44,45,46].…”
Section: Calibration Of the Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In general, it is possible to observe that the first mode associated with not negligible participating mass is a transversal mode, namely the first out-of-plane mode of the longitudinal walls of the main nave. Dispersion of vibration modes for such typology of structures has been already observed by other authors [40,41,42] and this can be considered a specific structural characteristic of these structures, in contrast with ordinary or modern buildings where the modal participating mass is generally greater than 70% and the first three modes give a cumulative mass generally greater than 85%. In addition, the results shown by the modal analyses are in agreement with the observation of the systematic analysis of the damage suffered by the churches after major earthquakes, that highlight that the church seismic behavior is predominantly ruled by the activation of local collapse mechanisms on several macro-elements [41,43,44,45,46].…”
Section: Calibration Of the Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…), evaluating possible interactions with adjacent elements. Applications of this approach may be found, among the others, in Betti et al (2018), Brandonisio et al (2013), D'Ayala and Paganoni (2011), Doglioni et al (1994), Formisano and Marzo (2017), Lagomarsino and Podestà (2004a,b), while a recent investigation on the estimation of main frequency of ancient masonry churches may be found in Lopez et al (2019).…”
Section: Seismic Assessment Methods Indicated In the Italian Directivementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, the use of non-linear methods, such as the conventional pushover approach, implies the decisive choice of the control point on which the non-linear global response and the evaluation of the seismic performance depend. A discussion of this aspect may be found, among others, in Betti et al (2018). While a general discussion on the application of non-linear analyses and the comparisons with the macro-element approach may be found in Castellazzi et al (2013) and Valente and Milani (2018b).…”
Section: Seismic Assessment Methods Indicated In the Italian Directivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of assessing the vulnerability of cultural heritage against earthquakes has become an essential pre-requisite for constant safety of city centers, considering the massive presence of peculiar existing structures in the European area (Roca et al 2013;Betti et al 2018;Valente and Milani 2018). Churches are expressly widespread in Italy, particularly in high-seismicity regions, and they are characterized by complex geometries, irregularities, and highly heterogeneous materials, all features that make them much vulnerable during a seismic event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%