With great interest we have read the excellent manuscript by Møller et al. in which survival rates of patients with bladder cancer (UCB) and primary muscle invasion (primMI) were compared to those of patients with secondary muscle invasion (secMI) [1]. For this purpose, the authors analyzed 650 patients within the Cancer Registry of Norway treated with curative intent from 2008 to 2012. The vast majority underwent radical cystectomy (RC; n ¼ 556, 86%). In the RC group, 506 patients (91%) had primMI. This relatively high percentage (compared to international literature) was partly explained by the assignment of patients primarily diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive UCB to the primMI group if they progressed to muscle-invasive stage within 4 months after initial diagnosis. Within the RC group, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) at 5 years was 42% and 41% for patients with primMI and secMI, respectively, with no significant difference (HR: 0.93, p ¼ .78).Available data comparing prognosis of patients with primMI vs. secMI following RC was concisely discussed by Møller et al. and is summarized here again (Table 1) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The majority of these studies confirm these findings from Norway showing no differences in survival rates. However, a recent multicentre study of 572 patients undergoing RC without neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated higher 5year-CSM rates for secMI compared to primMI (53.5 vs. 35.5%, p < .001) [12]. In a paper published more than 10 years ago in the Scandinavian Journal of Urology including 607 patients treated with RC for cT1 UCB, we demonstrated a 5-year-CSM of 24% for this group, although slightly more than one third of these patients showed an upstaging in the RC specimen (!pT2,pN0 or pTany,pNþ) [14]. However, it is also undoubted that a general indication for early RC in all