2002
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkf187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of two different methods of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi

Abstract: Two different methods of inoculum preparation for susceptibility testing were analysed. The first method was adjustment of inoculum size by haemocytometer counting. The second method was spectrophotometric adjustment at 530 nm. The reliability of both methods was assessed by colony counting. The overall agreement between colony counting and haemocytometer counts was 93.6%, and the intraclass coefficient correlation was 0.71 (P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation index between colony counts and optical density value… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fungal strains were maintained on Potato Dextrose (PD) agar. Haemocytometer cell-counting, with some modifications was used for counting the number of cells for each fungal culture (Aberkane et al, 2002). The inoculum of each isolate was prepared by first growing the fungus on potato dextrose (PD) agar slants for seven days at 35°C.…”
Section: Fungal Strains and Inoculum Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungal strains were maintained on Potato Dextrose (PD) agar. Haemocytometer cell-counting, with some modifications was used for counting the number of cells for each fungal culture (Aberkane et al, 2002). The inoculum of each isolate was prepared by first growing the fungus on potato dextrose (PD) agar slants for seven days at 35°C.…”
Section: Fungal Strains and Inoculum Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After appropriate dilutions, inoculum sizes (spores/ mL) were determined by direct microscopic observation using a haemocytometer (Aberkane et al 2002).…”
Section: Inoculum Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This standard is similar to the one published by the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi, but with the following minor modifications: (i) RPMI 1640 was supplemented with glucose to reach a 2% concentration and (ii) the inoculum sizes were between 1.0 ϫ 10 5 and 5.0 ϫ 10 5 CFU/ml (1,3,16,18). The antifungal susceptibility results for the blood isolate were as follows: amphotericin B, 1 g/ml; itraconazole, Ͼ8 g/ml; voriconazole, 4 g/ml; posaconazole, Ͼ8 g/ml; and terbinafine, 2 g/ml.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%