2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01231.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of TRI-DOT Rapid HIV test with fourth-generation ELISA for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus

Abstract: This study evaluated the TRI-DOT Rapid HIV test for the early detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in comparison with a fourth-generation ELISA (Vironostika HIV Uniform II). Of 23,609 sera, seven (0.03%) gave discordant results. Six of these were reactive only by the fourth-generation assay and were p24 antigen-positive by VIDAS DUO, Western blot and qualitative RT-PCR tests. The remaining discordant serum was considered to be false-positive by the TRI-DOT assay, as it was negative by repe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of 23 609 samples comparing rapid test with fourth generation assay from a high prevalence (4·8%) region, six reactive samples exclusive to fourth generation assay were also confirmed by WB. The authors concluded that rapid tests were a suitable alternative for emergency situations (Sudha et al , ). Overall there is much confusion about donor prevalence due to wide variance in the test results and confirmatory algorithms.…”
Section: Efforts To Limit Tti Through Blood Screening In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of 23 609 samples comparing rapid test with fourth generation assay from a high prevalence (4·8%) region, six reactive samples exclusive to fourth generation assay were also confirmed by WB. The authors concluded that rapid tests were a suitable alternative for emergency situations (Sudha et al , ). Overall there is much confusion about donor prevalence due to wide variance in the test results and confirmatory algorithms.…”
Section: Efforts To Limit Tti Through Blood Screening In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That could be the possible reason why HIV TRI-DOT missed them for HIV-2. The false negativity of HIV-2 with HIV TRI-DOT BIOMED must be severely taken into account because: 1) there is a high degree of chance to miss HIV-2 infection in any patient who is infected with HIV-2 alone or combined with HIV-1; 2) the assay is widely used in this country (5,15); and 3) treatment regimens are also specific to HIV subtypes (21,22,23). Out of these seven specimens, five were HIV-2-indeterminate, all had p26 band, and two specimens had gp105/ 125 in addition to p26.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows the results of various studies from India estimating HIV seroprevalence. [1011121314151617] In a previous study from our institute, Sharma et al ., screened 2, 35,461 donors between 1996 and 2002 using third generation ELISA. The prevalence of HIV ranged from 0.16% in 1996 to 0.3% in 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sudha, et al ., evaluated the TRI-DOT Rapid HIV test for the early detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in comparison with a 4 th generation ELISA (Vironostika HIV Uniform II) in 23609 samples between January 2003 and April 2004. [17] In the case of discordance, sera were retested by Western Blot, and qualitative RT-PCR. The overall prevalence of HIV-1 and HIV-2 in the sera studied was 4.7% and 0.2%, respectively, and 19 (1.7%) of the 1150 HIV-reactive patients were infected with both HIV-1 and HIV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%