2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy of sorafenib versus best supportive care in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: A case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
132
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
132
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with a previous study by Wang et al (25), in which only grades 1 and 2 drug-related adverse events were observed with sorafenib therapy, as well as other studies that observed no serious adverse events associated with sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced HCC (48,64). By contrast, grade 4 liver-related adverse events have been reported for Child-Pugh class B patients (65), with poorer outcomes observed in class B versus class A advanced HCC patients following sorafenib therapy (66).…”
Section: Univariate Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with a previous study by Wang et al (25), in which only grades 1 and 2 drug-related adverse events were observed with sorafenib therapy, as well as other studies that observed no serious adverse events associated with sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced HCC (48,64). By contrast, grade 4 liver-related adverse events have been reported for Child-Pugh class B patients (65), with poorer outcomes observed in class B versus class A advanced HCC patients following sorafenib therapy (66).…”
Section: Univariate Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nagano et al noticed that the overall median progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced HCC was 2.0 months (40). In addition, the association between sorafenib therapy and longer DFS is largely concordant with previous studies in patients with HCC (25,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52). In a pilot study by Wang et al (25) that included 31 patients at a high risk of recurrence, sorafenib therapy following hepatic resection significantly improved the time to recurrence as well as the recurrence rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically the combination of sorafenib and mTOR inhibitors has been preferred, as mTOR inhibition has the strongest evidence and rationale for an anticancer effect. However, sorafenib is poorly tolerated in liver transplant patients, with or without mTOR immunosuppression, making it difficult to achieve a therapeutic dose of sorafenib (84)(85)(86)(87). Nonetheless, there are a couple of case series that have described a survival benefit from using adjuvant sorafenib in post-transplant patients at high risk of recurrence (88)(89)(90).…”
Section: Immunosuppression and Sorafenibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to various therapeutic approaches used before recurrence, including local treatment, hepatic resection and chemotherapy, no standard posttransplant adjuvant chemotherapy has been established. Sorafinib (SORA) and everolimus (EVL) have already been investigated for application in recurrence HCC after LT [3][4][5][6] based on roles of B-Raf and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/protein kinase B (AKT) pathways in the pathogenesis of HCC [7,8]. Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor samples can provide molecular abnormalities of different pathways for prediction of treatment outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%