2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Effects of Glucose-Lowering Medications on Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: ImportanceType 2 diabetes (T2D) is the leading cause of kidney disease in the US. It is not known whether glucose-lowering medications differentially affect kidney function.ObjectiveTo evaluate kidney outcomes in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) trial comparing 4 classes of glucose-lowering medications added to metformin for glycemic management in individuals with T2D.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA randomized clinical trial was conducted at 36 sites across … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from previous observational studies comparing these treatments 32 33 34 are at risk of bias from residual (unmeasured) confounding. Although a recent observational study 35 emulated some of the results of the GRADE (Glycemia Reduction Approaches In Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study) randomised trial, 29 36 37 neither the trial nor the observational study considered SGLT-2 inhibitors, which limits the applicability of the results to routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from previous observational studies comparing these treatments 32 33 34 are at risk of bias from residual (unmeasured) confounding. Although a recent observational study 35 emulated some of the results of the GRADE (Glycemia Reduction Approaches In Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study) randomised trial, 29 36 37 neither the trial nor the observational study considered SGLT-2 inhibitors, which limits the applicability of the results to routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%