2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03803-9
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Comparative effectiveness of 9 ovulation-induction therapies in patients with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a network meta-analysis

Abstract: The comparative efficacies of ovulation-induction treatments in patients with clomiphene citrate-resistant (CCR) polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are not well known. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to rank the reproductive efficacies of these treatments. We ultimately included 26 randomized clinical trials with 2722 participants and 9 types of therapies: clomiphene citrate (CC), metformin, letrozole, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), unilateral laparoscopi… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
19
4
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

Range
2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
19
2
1
1

Relationship

0
23

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 23 publications

(22 citation statements)
references

References 56 publications

0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The RCT published by Hashim HA (2011), which included the largest number of patients and cited by two reviews ( Yu et al, 2017 ; Bordewijk et al, 2020a ) and Guidelines ( Teede et al, 2018 ) are essential and had recently been suspected by rationalization on the study and data integrity ( Bordewijk et al, 2020b ; Bordewijk et al, 2020c ; Bordewijk et al, 2020d ). Although Hashim HA.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of Yu et al (2017) showed no difference in live birth, pregnancy, ovulation induction, or miscarriage rates between Met/Met-CC and LOD (Yu et al, 2017). The same authors concluded that no recommendation could be made regarding ovulation induction in patients with CCR-PCOS because the quality of evidence was low and the confidence intervals wide.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literature
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation