2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness and survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Hellenic Registry of Biologics: Low rates of remission and 5-year drug survival

Abstract: Response rates were comparable among anti-TNF agents. Overall, 5-year drug survival was below 50%, with infliximab demonstrating increased safety-related discontinuations. Remission rates are low in clinical practice. Strategies to increase effectiveness and long-term survival of anti-TNF agents in RA are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
55
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
14
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After adjusting for baseline confounding factors, we showed the overall higher drug survival of etanercept compared with both monoclonal antibodies, similarly to what is reported by the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) and GISEA registries and by a multicentric study carried out in France . At variance, some European studies did not find any significant difference between the 2 subcutaneous TNFi , whereas US reports showed greater drug survival on infliximab compared with both adalimumab and etanercept . These apparently discrepant findings might be due to differences in the baseline characteristics of the cohorts, in the regimen of administered treatments, or other methodologic variations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…After adjusting for baseline confounding factors, we showed the overall higher drug survival of etanercept compared with both monoclonal antibodies, similarly to what is reported by the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) and GISEA registries and by a multicentric study carried out in France . At variance, some European studies did not find any significant difference between the 2 subcutaneous TNFi , whereas US reports showed greater drug survival on infliximab compared with both adalimumab and etanercept . These apparently discrepant findings might be due to differences in the baseline characteristics of the cohorts, in the regimen of administered treatments, or other methodologic variations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A possible explanation for these findings could be related to the high proportion of patients that received biological DMARDs which came to be used in more than a quarter of the population at the end of the observation period, which differs from the Brazilian and Colombian cohorts mentioned previously in which these were not used . It should be noted that these drugs have demonstrated excellent effectiveness in a wide range of patients, including those classed as difficult to control , despite being costly for any healthcare system and exhibiting a high incidence of adverse events . This explains the decision made by the treating team to use them in determined cases with proper justification .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until April 2015, nearly 3000 patients had been recruited in the registry. Details about its design and data collection protocol have been published elsewhere 11 . According to the national guidelines, treating rheumatologists are those who decide when a patient has to be treated with a biologic agent.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed protocol and variables collected are described elsewhere 11 . In patients with SpA, baseline characteristics additionally included current and/or a history of axial SpA (inflammatory back pain or radiological spondylitis/sacroiliitis) and/or peripheral arthritis (for lower limbs, defined as arthritis distal to the hip) based on the treating clinician's judgment.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%