Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics

Abstract

Osteoclasts are bone‐resorbing cells differentiated from macrophage/monocyte precursors in response to macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) and receptor activator of NF‐κB ligand (RANKL). In vitro models are principally based on primary bone marrow macrophages (BMMs), but RAW 264.7 cells are frequently used because they are widely available, easy to culture, and more amenable to genetic manipulation than primary cells. Increasing evidence, however, has shown that the vastly different origins of these two cell types may have important effects on cell behavior. In particular, M‐CSF is a prerequisite for the differentiation of BMMs, by promoting survival and proliferation and priming the cells for RANKL induction. RAW 264.7 cells readily form osteoclasts in the presence of RANKL, but M‐CSF is not required. Based on these key differences, we sought to understand their functional implications and how it might affect osteoclast differentiation and related signaling pathways. Using a robust and high‐throughput proteomics strategy, we quantified the global protein changes in osteoclasts derived from BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells at 1, 3, and 5 days of differentiation. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD009610. Correlation analysis of the proteomes demonstrated low concordance between the two cell types (R2 ≈ 0.13). Bioinformatics analysis indicate that RANKL‐dependent signaling was intact in RAW 264.7 cells, but biological processes known to be dependent on M‐CSF were significantly different, including cell cycle control, cytoskeletal organization, and apoptosis. RAW 264.7 cells exhibited constitutive activation of Erk and Akt that was dependent on the activity of Abelson tyrosine kinase, and the timing of Erk and Akt activation was significantly different between BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells. Our findings provide the first evidence for major discrepancies between BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells, indicating that careful consideration is needed when using the RAW 264.7 cell line for studying M‐CSF‐dependent signaling and functions. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Irisin directly stimulates osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in vitro and in vivo

“…Thus, both dosing and timing relative to developmental age may be determinants of irisin’s function as a dynamic signaling molecule in the skeleton, and its actions on specific bone cell types. It should be noted that the relatively narrow dose range for stimulating osteoclastogenesis could have physiologic implications since exercise induces rapid changes in serum calcium ( Ng et al, 2018 ). If irisin targets both osteoclasts and osteocytes, it may serve as another counter-regulatory hormone to maintain serum calcium during the early phases of exercise much like parathyroid hormone ( Ng et al, 2018 ).…”

Biomechanical Contributions to Macrophage Activation in the Tumor Microenvironment

“…The inconsistent findings from many of the studies discussed here can potentially be attributed to differences in cell lines, surface chemistries, time points analyzed, and other variables, but nonetheless emphasize the important fact that commonly used macrophage cell lines and primary cells exhibit differing responses to identical stimuli, often making in vitro findings difficult to compare. This is true for both murine (4,102,103) and human (104,105) cell sources. Additionally, there are many differences between human and murine macrophage biology, from surface marker expression to metabolic states, that can result in stark differences in functional output (106)(107)(108).…”

Chaenomelis fructus inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppressing NFATc1 expression and prevents ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis

“…This study has the following limitations: i) Normal osteoclasts require RANKL and M-CSF when they differentiate, but RAW 264.7 cells do not require M-CSF. This cannot be explained by the complete analysis of physiological osteoclast differentiation [47]. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the osteoclast inhibition ability of CF through bone marrow macrophages cells extracted from mice or rats under the RANKL and M-CSF treatment in the future.…”