1989
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1002734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Antithrombotic and Hemorrhagic Effects of Dermatan Sulfate, Heparan Sulfate, and Heparin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(17 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tested dose of DS appears to be potentially suitable for antithrombotic use [7] but as seen in the present study there is a risk for bleeding complications similar to that of the tested LMWHs. These results are in line with results from a various experimental haemostasis model (Cade ear bleeding model) where doses up to 5.0 mg/kg only slightly increased blood loss [30],…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The tested dose of DS appears to be potentially suitable for antithrombotic use [7] but as seen in the present study there is a risk for bleeding complications similar to that of the tested LMWHs. These results are in line with results from a various experimental haemostasis model (Cade ear bleeding model) where doses up to 5.0 mg/kg only slightly increased blood loss [30],…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Naroparcil exerted its antithrombotic effect without enhancing bleeding, even at high oral doses ( 400 mg/kg). Whilst it is difficult to extrapolate experimental (animal) data to possible effects in man, using the same type of model, the bleeding enhancing effects of heparin have been clearly demonstrated (19, 30-32, present study) and no or little effect on bleeding time has been observed with dermatan sulfate and the heparinoid Org 10172 (31)(32)(33). These experimental observations coincide with those obtained in man (see Introduction}, hence it is possible that naroparcil could have an excellent safety profile (antithrombotic effect compared to bleeding risk).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The selected dose of DS is high but known to have minimal effect on bleeding [18] and therefore to be potentially suitable for throm boprophylaxis. One might expect that r-hiru din in the tested dose would be capable of completely preventing occlusive thrombosis and even reducing the frequency of thombosis, especially when administered by intrave nous route that generates high initial plasma activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike heparin DS does not inhibit factor Xa and is virtually inactive as an anticoagulant in conventional in vitro clotting assays [15]. It has also been suggested that DS has a profibrinolytic effect probably due to plasminogen activation [16], although recent data do not support this theo ry [17], Experimental data from rabbits show that 5-10 times higher doses of DS are re quired to gain a similar antithrombotic effect as UH (Wessler model) and doses up to 5.0 mg/kg only slightly increase blood loss (Cade ear bleeding model) [18], The aim of this study was to evaluate in an in vivo experimental venous thrombosis model in rabbits the individual thrombopro phylactic effect of four commercially avail able LMWHs in doses clinically recom mended by the manufacturer and compare the efficacy to that of recombinant hirudin (rhirudin, CGP 39393) and DS (MF 701).…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%