2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviour of Two Cementless Short Stems for Hip Replacement: Linea Anatomic and Minihip

Abstract: A comparative study between two stems (Linea Anatomic and Minihip) has been performed in order to analyse the differences in their biomechanical behaviour, concerning stem micromotions and load transmission between stem and bone. From the corresponding finite element models, a parametric study was carried out to quantify ranges of micromotions taking into account: friction coefficient in the stem-bone interface, press-fit and two types of gait cycle. Micromotions were evaluated for each stem at six different l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of reduced BMD, extensive micromovements and the risk of increased migration with subsequent loss of optimal implant position can decisively impair osseointegration leading to implant failure [16,17]. In cementless THA, especially the initial stem stability is an essential factor in forming a sufficient fixation between the bone and the prosthesis [18]. Other potential complications of reduced BMD in the context of cementless THA are the increased risk of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures and aseptic loosening [12,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of reduced BMD, extensive micromovements and the risk of increased migration with subsequent loss of optimal implant position can decisively impair osseointegration leading to implant failure [16,17]. In cementless THA, especially the initial stem stability is an essential factor in forming a sufficient fixation between the bone and the prosthesis [18]. Other potential complications of reduced BMD in the context of cementless THA are the increased risk of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures and aseptic loosening [12,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the different factors influencing subsidence, press-fit is believed to be one of the key factors [18, 19]. Even though the surgeon is guided by visual, sensory and auditory clues when inserting the femoral stem, finding a good balance between a perfect press-fit level and not fracturing the femur by the stem remains challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, a short-stem implant should provide rigid primary fixation, extensive metaphyseal bone-implant contact for sufficient osseointegration and a more physiological load transfer reproducing a biomechanical behavior more similar to the physiological bone. However, the benefits of short femoral stems remain hypothetical and there is not a clear understanding of the influence of short-stem designs on bone biomechanics [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%