The citrate synthase of Escherichia coli is an example of a Type II citrate synthase, a hexamer that is subject to allosteric inhibition by NADH. In previous crystallographic work, we defined the NADH binding sites, identifying nine amino acids whose side chains were proposed to make hydrogen bonds with the NADH molecule. Here, we describe the functional properties of nine sequence variants, in which these have been replaced by nonbonding residues. All of the variants show some changes in NADH binding and inhibition and small but significant changes in kinetic parameters for catalysis. In three cases, Y145A, R163L, and K167A, NADH inhibition has become extremely weak. We have used nanospray/time-of-flight mass spectrometry, under nondenaturing conditions, to show that two of these, R163L and K167A, do not form hexamers in response to NADH binding, unlike the wild type enzyme. One variant, R109L, shows tighter NADH binding. We have crystallized this variant and determined its structure, with and without bound NADH. Unexpectedly, the greatest structural changes in the R109L variant are in two regions outside the NADH binding site, both of which, in wild type citrate synthase, have unusually high mobilities as measured by crystallographic thermal factors. In the R109L variant, both regions (residues 260 -311 and 316 -342) are much less mobile and have rearranged significantly. We argue that these two regions are elements in the path of communication between the NADH binding sites and the active sites and are centrally involved in the regulatory conformational change in E. coli citrate synthase.The Type II citrate synthases (CS) 1 of Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, are hexamers of identical subunits, which are strongly and specifically inhibited by the biological reducing agent, NADH, binding at a location distinct from the active site (1, 2). These properties distinguish them clearly from the Type I citrate synthases found in Gram-positive bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, which are homodimers without regulatory properties. Type I and Type II CS subunits all have the same overall fold and very similar active sites, so that, as a first approximation, a Type II hexamer may be regarded as a trimer of Type I dimers (3). From this we have argued that NADH inhibition in the Type II enzymes is an evolutionary add-on; Type I dimers were altered by a series of mutations to generate NADH sites and new contact surfaces so that hexamers could form. Our previous structural work on E. coli CS has shown that the six NADH binding sites are remote from the active sites and are located near the dimerdimer interfaces, with some residues contributed to each site by two subunits on either side of the interface (4). This finding explained why NADH binding induces a dimer to hexamer shift in the dimer-hexamer equilibrium shown by E. coli CS at moderate concentrations (1-20 M) (5).With the structure of the CS-NADH complex in hand, we can describe in detail the interactions between the protein and the nucleotide (4). The...