2018
DOI: 10.3390/app8122695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Current Control Techniques to Support Virtual Inertia Applications

Abstract: The rapid transition towards an inverter-dominated power system has reduced the inertial response capability of modern power systems. As a solution, inverters are equipped with control strategies, which can emulate inertia by exchanging power with the grid based on frequency changes. This paper discusses the various current control techniques for application in these systems, known as virtual inertia systems. Some classic control techniques like the proportional-integral, the proportional-resonant, and the hys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of the frequency drop on the active power change is presented in Table 3. A drop in frequency greater than short-term tolerance, i.e., >200 mHz, is reached in the event of the load increasing by 30 MW or more [15][16][17][18][19]. A frequency drop to the critical, i.e., to 49.80 Hz, limit corresponds to the load increasing by 25 MW.…”
Section: Response Of Isolated Eps To a Load Increasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of the frequency drop on the active power change is presented in Table 3. A drop in frequency greater than short-term tolerance, i.e., >200 mHz, is reached in the event of the load increasing by 30 MW or more [15][16][17][18][19]. A frequency drop to the critical, i.e., to 49.80 Hz, limit corresponds to the load increasing by 25 MW.…”
Section: Response Of Isolated Eps To a Load Increasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dynamics are much faster than the frequency dynamics, which are the main concern of this paper. A PI-type-2 controller as described in [37] is used to implement the current controllers which control the output of the current-controlled voltage sources. The ESS is interfaced through an LC filter with an inductance L f = 10mH and capacitance C f = 3.3μF .…”
Section: A Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the optimization algorithm in [ 12 , 13 ] may underestimate the optimal flux with no adaptation of real-time parameters’ mechanisms, which may as well direct the destabilization of the drive system and impact the problem of “motor stalling”, particularly in the existence of an immediate change in load torque. It should be noted that in the full operating region, there is a critical issue in the identification of IM parameters accurately [ 14 , 15 , 16 ] and simultaneously, even by using the IM parameter stacking algorithms. Over the last few years, researchers have been working on evolutionary algorithms [ 17 ] such as genetic algorithms (GA) and swarm-intelligence-based algorithms [ 18 ] such as PSO, GSO, DA, FF, and ACO for optimization purposes under different working environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%