2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparaison du pronostic obstétrical des tentatives d’accouchement par le siège : travail spontané versus déclenchement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference in cesarean rate, neonatal or maternal morbidity (1.69, OR ¼ 0.71-4.04; 0.52, OR ¼ 0.12-2.35; and 0.73, OR ¼ 0.21-2.51, respectively). 12 A secondary analysis of the PREMODA study also demonstrated that induction of labor for breech presentation did not appear to increase neonatal mortality or severe neonatal morbidity compared with planned caesarean delivery (1.4 versus 1.2, p ¼ 0.75). 13 Therefore, it seems reasonable to promote induction of labor in a term breech presentation in order to have a skilled obstetrician present during the delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There was no significant difference in cesarean rate, neonatal or maternal morbidity (1.69, OR ¼ 0.71-4.04; 0.52, OR ¼ 0.12-2.35; and 0.73, OR ¼ 0.21-2.51, respectively). 12 A secondary analysis of the PREMODA study also demonstrated that induction of labor for breech presentation did not appear to increase neonatal mortality or severe neonatal morbidity compared with planned caesarean delivery (1.4 versus 1.2, p ¼ 0.75). 13 Therefore, it seems reasonable to promote induction of labor in a term breech presentation in order to have a skilled obstetrician present during the delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%