1970
DOI: 10.4064/sm-36-3-195-212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compactness in spaces of measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to pass to the limit, one needs a compactness result for measures. A suitable result of this kind in our abstract framework is the one developed by Topsoe along his work on a generalization of Prohorov's Theorem ( [57]) to spaces which are not necessarily Polish ( [71,72,73]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to pass to the limit, one needs a compactness result for measures. A suitable result of this kind in our abstract framework is the one developed by Topsoe along his work on a generalization of Prohorov's Theorem ( [57]) to spaces which are not necessarily Polish ( [71,72,73]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of new results on the F-space question have been discovered recently: [26], [16], [11] and [36]. Tops0e [36] has an especially interesting characterization of w*-compactness versus tightness in Mt.…”
Section: Definitions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tops0e [36] has an especially interesting characterization of w*-compactness versus tightness in Mt. The remaining authors have, apparently, independently shown that a hemicompact espace is a F-space, as is any complete metric space [16].…”
Section: Definitions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decisive prelude was the short paper of Kisyński [1968], which produced the final class of Borel-Radon measures on Hausdorff topological spaces via inner regularity. In no time then Topsøe [1970aTopsøe [ ][1970b realized that this procedure opens the road to unification. However, these articles and the subsequent Pollard-Topsøe [1975] and Topsøe [1976] [1978] did not yet present a full systematization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation turned around with an innocent step which the present author took in an analysis course [1969/70], thus at the same time with Kisyński [1968] and Topsøe [1970aTopsøe [ ][1970b: He observed that the old proof of the extension theorem carries over verbatim from rings to that particular class of lattices described above (of course with an adequate notion of content), provided that instead of ϕ • one uses the formation ϕ σ : P(X) → [0, ∞], defined for an isotone set function ϕ : S → [0, ∞] with ϕ(∅) = 0 on a set system S with ∅ ∈ S to be ϕ σ (A) = inf{ lim l→∞ ϕ(S l ) : (S l ) l in S with S l ↑ some subset ⊃ A}. Thus ϕ σ is isotone with ϕ σ (∅) = 0 as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%