2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2018.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compaction analysis and optimisation of convex-faced pharmaceutical tablets using numerical techniques

Abstract: Capping failure, edge chipping, and non-uniform mechanical properties of convexfaced pharmaceutical tablets are common problems in pharma industry. In this paper, Finite Element Modelling (FEM) and Design of Experiment (DoE) techniques are adopted to find the optimal shape of convex-faced (CF) pharmaceutical tablet which has more uniform mechanical properties and less capping and chipping tendency. The effects of the geometrical parameters and friction on the compaction responses of convex-faced pharmaceutical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies (4.4% of the total) deal with the stress/strain distribution during the 3-point bending test [ 94 , 95 ]. The rest of the studies deal specifically with failure mechanisms (15.6%) [ 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 ], friction (11.1%) [ 4 , 28 , 103 , 104 , 105 ], temperature evolution (6.7%) [ 106 , 107 , 108 ], and viscoelastic behavior (6.7%) [ 29 , 109 , 110 ]. From the above account, it appears that FEA has been mostly implemented for the study of stress distribution during tablet formation by compression and during testing of various tablet shapes.…”
Section: Application Of Fea Modelling For Pharmaceutical Tabletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two studies (4.4% of the total) deal with the stress/strain distribution during the 3-point bending test [ 94 , 95 ]. The rest of the studies deal specifically with failure mechanisms (15.6%) [ 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 ], friction (11.1%) [ 4 , 28 , 103 , 104 , 105 ], temperature evolution (6.7%) [ 106 , 107 , 108 ], and viscoelastic behavior (6.7%) [ 29 , 109 , 110 ]. From the above account, it appears that FEA has been mostly implemented for the study of stress distribution during tablet formation by compression and during testing of various tablet shapes.…”
Section: Application Of Fea Modelling For Pharmaceutical Tabletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baroutaji et al (2019) [ 96 ] studied the effects of geometrical parameters on the compression of convex-faced tablets by applying experimental design (DoE) and response surface methodology (RSM) to compression responses computed by FEA in order to optimize tableting. Relationships were established between the diameter and radius of curvature with the friction coefficient, residual die pressure, relative density variation, and relative shear stress.…”
Section: Application Of Fea Modelling For Pharmaceutical Tabletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach seeks the solution for the optimisation problem with multiple objectives by formulating a desirability function which combines all multiple responses into a single non-dimension objective function, thus converting the multi-objective optimisation problem into a single objective problem. This desirability function takes a value between 0 and 1 and the optimal solution is the one with the greatest desirability [4,53]. The crashworthiness multi-objective design optimisation framework is illustrated in Figure 10.…”
Section: Multi-objective Design Optimisation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations were then extrapolated to identify relevant model terms based on how well the equation fits the experimental data. The stepwise regression was chosen as it eliminates the insignificant model terms automatically from the polynomial equation [173,174]. The statistical significance of the models and each term in the regression equation were evaluated using statistical measures that achieve the best fit [175].…”
Section: Response Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%